Re: [trill] Comments on draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-mpls-06

2018-01-17 Thread Andrew G. Malis
Donald, I agree with your recommended changes. While we’re discussing the draft, I've previously commented that it has several places where interoperability between implementations could be difficult because there are several implementation choices that can be made, and the draft doesn’t make

[trill] Comments on draft-ietf-trill-transport-over-mpls-06

2018-01-16 Thread Donald Eastlake
Hi, There are a bunch of RFCs referenced in this draft but not listed in the References section. They need to be added to the References. I think the Security Considerations section, while it provides a good set of references, needs one added sentence: something about how the document does not