PS - I have a broader question about this work.
Why is this a service at all?
There are dozens of ways of taking existing IP or Ethernet traffic and
encapsulating them for IP tunnel transit, some including much stronger
protections (e.g. SEAL/AERO provides better fragmentation/reassembly
support)
Hi, Donald,
On 1/4/2017 5:43 PM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>> - the use of two different ports invites some potentially unintended
>> problems, e.g., selective blocking of the control vs. data plane. IMO,
>>
Hi Joe,
Thanks for the comments.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>
> Some observations:
>
> - the title is misleading; this is TRILL over UDP, not trill over IP.
Humm... The two encapsulations specified do use UDP and it seems
implausible that TCP would be used. But it is possi
Some observations:
- the title is misleading; this is TRILL over UDP, not trill over IP.
- the use of two different ports invites some potentially unintended
problems, e.g., selective blocking of the control vs. data plane. IMO,
given that TRILL's purpose is to extend Ethernet (not IP), this serv
Hi,
I agree with your comment,
thank you,
Cheers,
Ines.
On 30.12.2016 02:43, Donald Eastlake wrote:
Section 4.5: TRILL Over IP IS-IS SubNetwork Point of Attachment
I think it would be nice to add in the text the meaning of
"11"
depicted in the
Hi Ines,
Thanks for the review. See below:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Ines Robles
wrote:
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> Hi,
>
> QA review for "TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)
> over IP" I-D:
>
>
> Document: draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08.txt
> Revi
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Has Nits
Hi,
QA review for "TRILL (Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links)
over IP" I-D:
Document: draft-ietf-trill-over-ip-08.txt
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: December 28, 2016
Intended Status: Proposed Standard
Summary:
I believe the dr
