Re: [trill] Review of draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd-04

2017-03-23 Thread Zhangmingui (Martin)
Hi Carlos, 1. Yes. Section 5 rather than Seciton 4 is relevant. The last paragraph of the Intro will be updated to reflect this. 2. OK. The text will be updated. Thanks, Mingui From: Carlos Pignataro [cpign...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 3:20

[trill] Review of draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd-04

2017-03-23 Thread Carlos Pignataro
Reviewer: Carlos Pignataro Review result: Has Nits Hi, This is a short yet well written document. Looks really good. Just a couple of small questions/comments: 1. It's not clear exactly what from RFC 7175 is being updated by Section 4. This is based on the last paragraph of the Intro, yet Sectio