You obviously have not seen the 2009 sequel. They brought the same dude back
and tried to modernize him (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUCyvw4w_yk). It
is just as laughable.
I don't see the point. From what I can tell this is a forum dedicated to
proprietary Windows antivirus software, which hosts official support forums
for proprietary Windows antivirus software. It's probably one of the last
places to bring up discussion of GNU/Linux-libre, freedom, and all tha
You are certainly entitled to calling software junk. With many thousands of
packages in our repos, there are plenty of crappy programs you will find.
Though personally I try to always err on the side of cutting the programmers
some slack. The number of people that can program in any meaningfu
El sáb, 14-05-2011 a las 02:32 +0200, dasfox escribió:
> are you honestly going to sit here and tell us that if you've used Linux
> for the past 11 years it's all just been a peachy dream ride for you and at
> times you didn't feel like yelling at some software or banging your head and
> cal
Look Magic Banana I don't Linux lessons, I've been using Linux for 11 years,
I'm far from being a newbie that needs to be told what it is and isn't...
You're being rude and condescending!
Any of us has the right to call something junk when it is. I said Plymouth
was junk not Trisquel, there'
Well, it may only happen when the next version of Trisquel is released.
Usually, regular updates are only security and bug-fix ones...
Some trisquel-* are updated from time to time (yesterday for instance!) what
should mean (although I have never tried to check) that the default install
cha
everything works now thxs for the help
Microsoft and Adobe still benefit from pirated proprietary software, just not
as much as software paid for at the full price, and obtained legally.
It's because, even the pirated software, is still promoting the MS operating
systems, encouraging the use of it's file formats and increasing Win
Thanks to both of you.
@Magic Banana: If that's the case, i'll stick with my old Gnash until the
newest Gnash version becomes a default.
The trisquel-* packages are meta-packages, i.e., packages that do not install
anything by themselves but depend on a bunch of other packages (that you
often want to install at once, hence the convenience of a meta-package).
Therefore, it is safe to remove a trisquel-* package. The only troubl
> Also, the philosophy now refers to "open source" when once it was
> about "free software".
>
> We can only hope that they will not water it down even further (if
> that is possible).
Don't count on it:
http://quidam.cc/03-05-2010/ubuntu-promise-point-4
I think because Ubuntu is really in the "open source" camp they will use or
at least offer a proprietary program and both the free alternative if the
free alternative does not perform at a certain level (e.g. adobe flash and
gnash). Since open source only cares about the quality of software
12 matches
Mail list logo
