Is abrowser a trisquel thing? I'm also interested in hearing the answer to
Magic Banana's question above.
I used to like to have both installed. One I would use to browse with tor
the other I would have non-tor. That is kind of an odd use but it is a
possible reason to have both.
There is also a Mozilla add-on that opens the video automatically with
SMPlayer after configuring it in the options (changing minitube to smplayer):
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ext-youtube/
I have a 4.5 in my desktop pc, and I wanted to try upgrade to 5.0
I had already tried once, but I had some problems and I had to reinstall 4.5,
(formatting hdd). There is a possibility to downgrade without reinstalling,
If things go still bad?
Thanks
Is it Free?
It says it's released under version 1.1 of the Mozilla Public License.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:20:14 +0100 (CET)
t...@tius.it wrote:
I have a 4.5 in my desktop pc, and I wanted to try upgrade to 5.0
I had already tried once, but I had some problems and I had to reinstall
4.5, (formatting hdd). There is a possibility
When Trisquel 6.0 gets released, will there be an easy way to upgrade an
existing LTS (4.0) to the newer one? I know with the standard Ubuntu that
they have functionality in their update manager to allow a direct LTS to LTS
update.
I figured since Trisquel uses the same Update Manager as
In the System-- Administration--Update Manager menu there is the button
[run upgrade]
Now I trying to upgrade...
I've never done an LTS to LTS upgrade before in Trisquel and I am guessing
that this in the command line does the same as it does in Ubuntu in the
Update Manager when clicking the Upgrade button like this:
1. Set Show new distribution releases to Long term support releases only in
You could try Torbutton to avoid installing and using two browsers in
parallel: https://www.torproject.org/torbutton/
Check this
https://parabolagnulinux.org/news/Iceweasel-libre/
Hi Everyone
I seem to always be missing some library. I was thinking about making a
shell script that would just install all the development packages.
Is this insane? Any nasty side effects?
Thanks for reading-Patrick
Under just risk *lol*
apt-get install *-dev*
or
apt-get install *-dev
On 12-02-01 08:02 PM, im.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Under just risk *lol*
Thanks
Actually I tried something similar and it won't just install the -dev
package but the packages related to it. It looks like it might install
much of the repository.
Is there a way to force only one package to be
Man, so many SSL errors on that site popping up and Firefox trying to warn
about an untrusted connection.
I upload a pdf
here, sorry for double post, I forgot attach
What I used to do was download the .deb, type dpkg -i package.deb and if it
fails, I'd aptitude it's dependencies. apt-get -f install or --fix-missing
might also do the trick,
but if you have a more sophisticated way in mind, please share it:)
I was thinking about switching to Arch
Well
It is too bad the IceCat dev is running into issues with getting his releases
out. I've always wondered why the PPA was two versions behind and now I know
why. As for the PDF, I have used IceWeasel before on Debian and thought it to
be the same features wise as Firefox. It was also up to
I really like your message and that way i like this post, keep posting
more...
23 matches
Mail list logo
