>I'd looked up the documentation and expected an option "Install Trisquel
alongside Windows 7", but that option wasn't there.
But there is! http://trisquel.info/files/trisquel1.png
>It was only after all my files were gone that I realized I could have saved
them—the Windows partition was stil
I believe this happened because in Toutatis firefox seems to be a real
package instead of just a virtual package.
http://packages.trisquel.info/search?suite=default§ion=all&arch=any&searchon=names&keywords=firefox
I think the tech support guy tried to use the recovery media to recover the
files. It didn't work. It was only after all my files were gone that I
realized I could have saved them—the Windows partition was still accessible
in the Trisquel installation. I was just too panicked to realize it.
As Ruben said at LibrePlanet, Trisquel isn't about the bleeding edge, because
it's the blood of the users. :)
Thanx, but
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/best-way-test-trisquel#comment-32909
This is what I get when I try to install Abrowser:
~ $ sudo apt-get install abrowser
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
abrowser-globalmenu aptdaemon firefox firefox-globalmenu python-apt
pyt
On 02/04/13 10:59, Armworm wrote:
Windows became unbootable; I got a Blue Screen of Death whenever I
tried to boot it. I panicked and called tech support for my computer
manufacturer, and (surprise, surprise) my warranty had expired. I
paid $50 to hear that I had to reinstall Windows and lose all
Unlike Gentoo, Dragora GNU/Linux uses pre-compiled packages. Unlike Gentoo,
Dragora's package manager does not resolve dependencies:
Currently, by default, Dragora's package system does not offer automatic
dependency resolution, since that would need more code and, in some cases,
require comp
An excuse to spend inhuman level of time in front of a computer, suffering.
That's actually roughly what happened to me the first time I tried to install
Trisquel, although it was my fault in the end. Here's my GNU/Linux story:
I knew I couldn't dispense with Windows, because I was working on
If you only want to test that once and ensure that everything works as
expected, you can use a Live system with no persistence and install whatever
you want in the Live system (it will be installed in RAM but 4 GB should be
enough). Of course, the installs would not survive a reboot but, agai
My bad. I just could not find where to download the source code...
No, not cool. An excuse to spend inhuman level of time in front of a
computer, suffering.
El 01/04/13 17:50, roep...@lavabit.com escribió:
> Dragora is tough as nails, requiring you to build everything from
> source on top of a system that is not pretty. I couldn't recommend it
> to myself, and a recommendation of Dragora is on the level of telling
> someone to "install Gentoo". :P
Co
Dragora is tough as nails, requiring you to build everything from source on
top of a system that is not pretty. I couldn't recommend it to myself, and a
recommendation of Dragora is on the level of telling someone to "install
Gentoo". :P
My .02
Dragora seems to also be pretty up-to-date. It's based on KISS, though, so
not for most people.
No. They need to package the carl9170 firmware. It's been a bug report for
ages.
Why doesn't fedora have good support for AR9170? I thought all that was
kernel-side ... and Fedora keeps very up to date with kernel releases.
It doesn't matter which free distribution you use. FSF/RMS tends to point
people to Trisquel because it is a free software distribution that also is
easy to install/use comparatively. Its also kept more up to date and has
fewer issues that a less technical user might have to deal with.
Here
He did say "free" also. And while I doubt that RMS would use the big-tent
phrase "free and open source" (that's more of a GNOME/Red Hat identity
marker, and a favorite of mine), he doesn't deny the truth of open source's
benefits, either. He sees the OS movement as lacking, though. For one, o
I kind of doubt that 4chan is the best place for advice on this. But then, I
avoid that dank corner of the interwebs like a cancer.
But yes, Trisquel is fully free, and currently the FSF's preference of OS.
There's a rather high chance that something won't work on your computer,
though ... e
charles_le...@hotmail.com wrote ..
> I recently watched a video in which Dr. Richard Stallman gave a
lecture about
> the importance of using free and open source software.
I very much doubt that :) He would have given a talk about the
importance of free software, not about the importance of open
While I'm trying to install ubuntuone-control-panel I get the following
message:
ubuntuone-control-panel:
Depends: python-ubuntuone-control-panel but it is not going to be installed
Depends: ubuntuone-client (>=2.99.92) but it is not installable
It is might be related to the following bug:
h
What happened to me (64 bits, also) was that Abrowser or Firefox was to be
installed but the other was installed already; I chrooted to /mnt or whatever
it was, uninstalled the (old) installed so that installation step could
proceed; and later I had to uninstall the (new) installed and instal
64.
Probably the system you use is 32-bit or you choose the 32-bit option in the
VM (VirtualBox?) and the image is 64-bit.
Yes it does, not all processors can virtualise x64 even thou they are x64.
For example, if I want to test a x64 image on my laptop I get the same error
as tarciozemel; however on my desktop it works just fine.
I actually wrote an email to the author to clear up my confusion and he said
the client and server are both GPL v3. And seahub (a web frontend) is Apache
2.0. Nice guy!
Hi thomasmilo!
Yes, Sabnzbd would not be allowed in the Trisquel repositories as it requires
the non-free unrar. Fortunately, this is easy to overcome. If you install
python-cheetah, unar and par2 from the Trisquel repositories then you can run
Sabnzbd from the python source files available
If you run in a VM, what processor you have doesn't matter...
Would you kindly answer what kind of a GPU driver would you like to install?
Apache 2.0 is a free software license.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#apache2
But it would be nice if the license were explicitly spelled out instead of
including a copy of a license. And it wasn't in the root of the tarball so
perhaps only some part is under Apache 2.0. The
1) No RAID here.
2) Yes, I have 2 HDDs. 1st is the one with Windows 7 32bit installed; 2nd
with Ubuntu 12.10 64bit. Bot with 2 partitions: 1 for OS, another to files.
But, in fact, I'm trying install in a pen drive (thank goodness, imagine that
mess in a production machine). But that sort o
I *really* need some persistence test becausa I need to make sure Trisquel
will suport and work well with my NVIDIA 9600GT with 2 monitors, some Compiz
effects and properly deal with screencasts production (I use RecordMyDesktop
and made editions with Audacity and Kdenlive in my actual Ubuntu
Have you really heard about successful installations with v6? That's a good
thing, because I was concerned about Trisquel team was released a version
without even test the instalation... This confirms that all this which is
happening with me is an exception. :-(
Yes, I've tried Trisquel Min
Awesome! I don't have any drives larger than 4gb right now, but will
definately look into testing this!! :-)
P.S. I actually formated the drive as FAT 32, Doesn't that allow larger
sizes?
Ahh I see that License file in the Server download as well. I know that the
GPL, especially version 3, is meant to be as respecting of user freedom as
possible. But what is it that makes the Apache License unacceptable in 100%
Libre Software?
I skimmed through the License file, and did find
Is this on 32 or 64 bits?
I see a GPL v3 license in the client .deb.
Open it with archive manager (file-roller) and browse to
/usr/share/doc/seafile/copyright
The licensing of the server remains a mystery to me. It claims to be "open
source" on this page http://seafile.com/en/help/server/ and I can find a copy
of
That 4 GB limit comes from the limitations of the FAT(16) file system as far
as I know. Make your partition EXT instead and you can have any size, up to
32 TB.
38 matches
Mail list logo
