I'm a divorced white male from southern Utah. Wanna party?
Btw, if you are looking for a nice UI font, check out Roboto. It's not in the
Trisquel 6 repos (will be in 7), but you can nab the .deb here:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/fonts-roboto
Hi!
My suggestions for nice (but by no means necessary) lighter software for older
systems are Sylpheed or Claws for email and for SOME (but not all) of your
browsing, you might not need all the features of Abrowser and prefer something
lighter. Midori is included on Trisquel-Mini, but Dillo is also
The openssl package contains a build date/time. (I don't know if all deb
packages do, but this one definitely does). So it should differ if Trisquel
rebuilds it.
What do you think are the essential steps from the guide i have to make?
Is it bad i formatted the whole ssd... could that be the reason of the random
poweroffs?
Did you make seabios your default bios on your laptop? Will this make it more
free? Will it help with the random poweroffs problem?
Hi Jonathan_Livingston!
If you want to change default fonts to make them bigger go to Trisquel Menu.
Definitions of system (my default language is not english so i am translating
it as i am reading on my pc). After that on "advanced settings" > "fonts" and
there you can change the size of f
Use gnome-tweak-tool to adjust font size. You will need to do this as both
user and root for it to take effect in applications that you run as root.
Hi
I am using laptop with 11" screen and 1366x768 resolution. I just tried out
Trisquel, but I can read descriptions and texts in this OS only with
difficulties, they are much smaller than in Windows 7. Is there some way how
to make these texts bigger? Switching resolution to 800x600 is not
I am merely saying that, with source code availability, Trisquel has the
ability to.
This shouldn't even be a thread. It is just a information on a blog that
shoving words into Julian's mouth.
Here's the link for the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFFTYRWB0Tk&t=20m
He just uses an example from Debian's bug to illustrate a point about
backdoors that are disguised a bu
Hello.
--
Andrew Stephenson
http://users.tpg.com.au/aste9974
Sent from Trisquel GNU/Linux
After Reading some more of The 'Fine' Manuals, including Debian's docs then
here:
https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/how-trisquel-made
I stand corrected, many binary packages are copied verbatim - so Thank You.
Of course, the checksums being the same is of itself not enough to go on. A
fully sel
Would defaulting to Cinnamon be a good idea?
I talked about the number of people who "maintain" a distribution...
And, there are a lot of people involved in Trisquel, besides the person
responsible for the software itself.
There are many libraries and programs which also have only one person
responsible for them, in its origin. And, I
You don't need any hardware upgrades whatsoever - though of course it'll be
far from being the last thing you do.
Here's a note about other distributions: Trisquel is committed to using only
Free Software: Free in that it respects what for us are the human rights
software users deserve.
L
This doesn't make any sense at all;
trisquel has exactly one developer.
It's the prime example of a small distro.
Nice attitude you have. The entire point of Trisquel is to only contain free
software and to not recommend or mention proprietary software.
youtube-dl works with soundcloud too; do you know if there is a reason to use
soundcloud-dl instead of youtube-dl?
Google is a front for the CIA/NSA.
(http://www.infowars.com/group-calls-for-hearings-into-googles-ties-to-cia-and-nsa/)
And, it repeatedly censors people who use their services - including myself.
(http://blackfernando.blogspot.pt/2013/03/como-o-youtube-censura-os-meus.html)
The reason why
:)
I don't necessarily have to know someone "personally", in order to trust him,
or her. I just have to know him, or her, well enough - as I would, if I had
the opportunity to relate with such a person. (1)
And, alternatively, one can reveal (very much) about one's true nature, just
by th
When I mentioned "smaller" distros, I meant the *small* ones, that are
maintained by half-a-dozen people, or so - who reveal very little about
themselves.
And, what I meant, overall, was that:
- I don't trust such "small" distributions.
- And, concerning the "big" ones, I don't trust the on
Probably a misunderstanding. When I first read that post, it did read like an
endorsement of the link. If you want to avoid inadvertently endorsing
something, you might want to disclaim that explicitly. Example: "This system
is no good (recommends proprietary software), but I do like the look
Actually, I do include Debian among those non-profit organizations with a
pro-Free Software policy...
Since, I can understand the (practical) need for a proprietary repository,
for those people who really need to use non-free programs. And, I think it's
better to have one such repository th
@quantumgravity: I have no doubt that Debian is "compromised" in the pretty
much same way as every GNU Linux distribution is compromised as well. Due to
the sheer amount of code for the Kernel itself, all applications used and all
the libs included it is close to impossible to validate code f
The point wasn't to promote proprietary software, but to point out a method
of distribution that seems very user-friendly.
Unless we are in thrall to some kind of non-proprietary cultism -- and if
this is true, someone please tell me so that I may cancel future donations in
support of Trisq
I don't know if what you're asserting is true, but if I may, I'd like to
point out that checksums show the contents of a file, not who made the file.
If Canonical and the Trisquel team use the exact same method to compile a
program (not incredibly unlikely), the checksums will be the same for
27 matches
Mail list logo
