The most important thing to consider is the license. As long as the license
is both Free Software and Open Source approved (GPL, Apache, BSD licenses,
MIT, MPL), they are the same thing and you can appease to both camps. Its
just that the two camps have different ideologies on how we should b
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3024305/security/privacy-conscious-users-rejoice-you-can-now-use-facebooks-android-app-over-tor.html
Thoughts? Who would have thought that Facebook would allow Tor in their
settings for their official app. Crazy.
About non-functional data, perhaps we ended up talking about
different movements when approaching the relevant questions...
I'm not for free culture. However, "free culture" is different from
"non-funcional data for non-commercial redistribution". Most people
think that they're the same (and in fa
> 1. It seems that, just because a might-be-free software recommends
> or suggests non-free software, it doesn't make the software non-free.
This is true. I think it is bad for free software to have non-free
dependencies, but that being the case does not negate the software
license and make it mag
