If Patrick is ok to a rolling system Parabola/OpenRC is also recommended to
him that’s rolling and nosystemd, otherwise please stick to Devuan and
Hyperbola those are LTS and nosystemd. I use both of Parabola/OpenRC, Devuan,
Hyperbola which I’m easy going alongside rolling and LTS systems.
I need to here remind Patrick once if you dnt want systemd you need to
instead install Parabola, Devuan, Hyperbola, which I need to admit that
systemd is quite complicated to config, with Parabola, Devuan, Hyperbola you
will have a simple and modern init system named OpenRC under FreeBSD
Check your logs. What do they say? Linux-libre had some deblobbing changes
with 4.16 - see
http://www.fsfla.org/pipermail/linux-libre/2018-April/003284.html
The most notable one here is changing from EINVAL ("Invalid argument") to
ENOENT ("No such file or directory") which, in some cases,
The best is to order a Purism’s ‘Librem’ laptop using Bitcoins, which
credits cards are always shitty nonfree. :)
Hello, thanks for your time.
I want to get a laptop that can be as free as possible. Want to get a laptop
with Libreboot. I don't have a lot of money, so i thought i would search for
a Thinkpad X60-X60s or T60. I prefer an X60-X60s model because it's gonna be
used as a library companion,
Don't you have a live system you could boot and do your urgent homework in?
BLAG was a nice distribution. Not for masochists. I used it for some months
as my main system, many years ago. It is now discontinued.
Use lxterminal and kill abrowser
Simple yes? hehe...
What is the output of `cat /proc/cmdline`?
Can you use tab completion to see what is inside /dev/mapper or /dev?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Error 2, not found
My concern is that Uruk may not get cirtified, it's Trisquel with a slightly
different ui.
Then again, I was more or less blindly trying things until something worked and
never actually understood what the problem was, so maybe you should wait for
someone smarter than I to respond before trying anything.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Something similar happened to me (the initramfs thing) with Trisquel 8 a few
months ago. The solution here[1] fixed the problem for me.
(initramfs) fsck /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-root
[1] https://askubuntu.com/questions/781315/ubuntu16-04-boots-into-initramfs
signature.asc
Description: PGP
I installed this version and i have some problems to install the plasma
desktop because there are missing dependancies:
audiocd-kio
foomatic-db-compressed-ppds
kde-window-manager
kde-workspace
klipper
libxp6
plasma-netbook
And akonadi doesn't work at all. I installed it manually so i
Jodiendo la bandera la puso ahí porque me gustó la calavera. No del PIP son
unos cobardes vendidos. Nacionalista sangre o libertad
Freenix applied back in March 1, 2016 but were denied because the first name
was similar to Slackware. The first name was FreeSlack. So they changed the
name and they are waiting for the approval. They are still under the review
process. That information was posted on their forum.
Amd64
I installed WebHTTrack Website Copier from Add/ Remove Applications:
https://www.httrack.com/
I tried launching it from the start menu, and it opened a browser tab, and
tried to open a page at: "bishop:8080" (Bishop is the name of this PC)
I opened it in a terminal, and it did the same, as
Off-topic, but I notice there are now a number of libre distros that aren't
in the FSF list, including FreeNix and ConnochaetOS mentioned here, as well
as Uruk, Hyperbola, and Heads:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
Is this because they don't meet the criteria, or because the
amenex wrote:
"The website uses the ASP server-side programming language, which requires a
Microsoft server, and the sourcecode of the website expects Internet Explorer
(IE 11)."
I suggest finding out a bit more about what versions of Windows and ASP the
website is running on, and what
Loldier:
"Yes, that did it."
Are you using the amd64 or i686 version of the .ISO? When I tried to boot on
my wife's Mac I was using the USB I made for my AA1 using the i686 version.
Let me know if I need to be using the amd64 version, otherwise I'll download
the more recent i686 RC and try
Where would be that firmware? Would it be part of the UEFI? I thought the
firmware was a binary that the kernel sends to the Wifi card for execution.
Firmware is software that is not executed on the CPU but on peripheral
processors. That software is not always "burned onto chip on the hardware":
the kernel can send it to the peripheral. It is a binary but the
corresponding source code may be available under the terms of a free license.
If you do not trust the upgrade, do a fresh install on top of one of the
system on the internal drive (specify the same partition for / and the same
partition for /home but do *not* ask for formatting the latter)... and get
rid of all the other systems.
"It's firmware, not drivers."
OK, I'm a little unclear on this. My understanding is that firmware is
software permanently burned onto chip on the hardware (eg BIOS), while
drivers are software parts of the OS that allow the kernel to communicate
with (and thus "drive") the hardware. I
> Linux distributions.
We say "GNU slash Linux" or "GNU plus Linux" here.
Is there any possibility the bootloader might have loaded the wireless card's
firmware (perhaps newly so because it's using UEFI)?
Quoting Magic Banana:
I had said: Between the three HDD's, my T420 now has five Trisquel OS's ...
Followed by MB's optimistic reply: "Don't you want just one?! You can upgrade
one Trisquel 7 that is on the internal hard drive (faster) with
'do-release-upgrade -d' (no need for a fresh
>Noscript is free software which is a good jump above open source. aka
better.
It is not. They are equivalent, only the philosophy behind it changes, which
doesn't have any impact at all on the very nature of the specific software.
Only the quality of the code makes software better or
I tried http://jenkins.trisquel.info/makeiso/iso/trisquel_8.0_amd64.iso
(released last Saturday).
For some reason, Trisquel 7's Startup Disk Creator could not install it (with
permanent storage, I have not tried without) on a USB key: it aborts in the
middle with an error about
2018-04-16T03:09:41+0200 ja...@bluehome.net wrote:
> "now is booting as a... UEFI OS?"
>
> Yup. Trisquel 8 should be fully UEFI compatible. Yay! With the
> exception of Secure Boot, which requires Microsoft to sign stuff for
> the project so it can be trusted. Our fearless leader said on IRC that
Hello, the Trisquel developpers may be interrested to have a look at these
reports :
https://h-node.org/notebooks/view/en/1699/Aspire-5738ZG-434G32MN
https://h-node.org/notebooks/view/en/1939/Ideapad-110-14IBR-
https://h-node.org/notebooks/view/en/1937/Aspire-E-15---E5-575G-54GY
Note : the
GNU-BORICUA
QUE ES ESO?
LA CABEZA CALABERA DE TU ICONO! PREFIERO la banderita pipiola! LOL\
nO LO SUENES TAN ALTO EL DISPARATE PIPIOLO!
lol
que viva la estadidad 51!!
The do-release-upgrade command says that there's no new version, maybe it
answers to your question.
Yeah,it should be restricted not 'secure'. When they say 'security', always
ask "whose security?"
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot
36 matches
Mail list logo
