I'm not sure if I get it: You recommend using a command like "gdisk -o
/dev/sdb" on the GRUB command line before I attempt a normal installation
with my usb stick? (There is no personal data since it is a new system which
wasn't in use yet.)
I was done this using gdisk command, but this needs your personal data to be
backed up to an USB SSD.
I have the problem that the installer can't create the GRUB MBR record on a
Cirrus7 Computer:
https://www.cirrus7.com/produkte/cirrus7-nimbus/overview
Probably because the Samsung m2 850 EVO SSD with 120 GB capacity needs a GPT
partition. But neither the graphical nor the text based installe
If you enjoy wm instead of general DE like Plasma, GNOME, MATE then you are
free to match your favourite wm with LXQt, that General DE force you to run
their built-in wm. Thus LXQt is the future for the later DE that you're free
to match your own wm and the shell itself (LXQt for here) is eno
Ancient hardware just like whose processors are ia64, mips64, ppc64, sparc64,
or i386 etc???
Ancient hardware just like whose processors are ia64, mips64, ppc64, sparc64,
or i386 etc???
Thank you for reply.
# gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
manuall
Being an KDE project for Falkon just doesn't ensure it to be too bloat, and
honestly Falkon just need a few Plasma deps. An OSM (OpenStreetMap) editor
named Marble, also has 2 channels, one is Plasma-independent and another one
is Plasma-integrated. I'm happy editing my OSM buses instructions
I have ssd, Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU N3530 @ 2.16GHz, 4Gb RAM and I think my
system boots fast. Faster then on Funtoo, Debian that I used before.
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 13.248s (kernel) + 19.747s (userspace) = 32.995s
I think to disable unnecessary services, disable kernel modu
You probably want to work with the FSF on this. It's already in their queue.
The preliminary conclusion was that it is at the very least GPL-incompatible
(choice of law clause in section 6), possibly non-free because of the PRC
provisions of section 7 (Because "you should not be required to n
I use GNU Octave's "video" package to process each frame mathematically...
Yes it was directed at you... So the kernel is different... Too bad, can't
make a proper comparison. But you almost make me want to change for Debian
again, lol, that is a great boot time.
Guess I will wait for MagicBanana to reply, I am curious if everyone is
having the same long boot proces
>benchmarking
Well, take a very old laptop and then install all the DEs you want to bench
in whatever order and just use them briefly. Then the last one you install is
LXDE, you stop and you exclaim, quite shocked: geee, this LXDE runs like
hell!
LXDE FTW, no doubt. But try it on very old
Well, I would expect that the binary provided by a program creator who runs a
Free Software project and does his best to provide everything under free
licenses, would be a proper binary and free license compliant. But you are
right :)
I assume the question is directed to me - I'm running and been running for
over 3 yrs now Debian Stable.
Are you running Trisquel 8 with the standard installation kernel? Or another
Linux-Libre flavour?
Thanks.
Trixself :)
Are you running Trisquel 8 with the standard installation kernel? Or another
Linux-Libre flavour?
Thanks.
Irony? Self-deprecating humour?
BTW Yes, I have ntpdate installed. Is there no known fix for this? Shall I
file a bug?
NTP all worked fine on Belenos. It's only since installing Flidas that I
struck this problem.
Wow! LXQT actually looks really nice, much more modern than the last LXDE I
looked at a couple of years ago.
loldier:
> "LXQt is a KDE lookalike. It has Plasma desktop and Falkon (ex-Qupzilla,
the browser) is a KDE project. I think it must be a lot more
resource-hungry."
Ae, I think rathe
"The Licensed Materials being provided to you hereunder are being made
publicly available by TI, even though they contain copyrighted material of TI
and its licensors, if applicable. In no event may you alter, remove or
destroy any copyright notice included in the Licensed Materials. To the exte
On 18-06-14 11:07 AM, great...@riseup.net wrote:
>All I am planning on doing is cutting clips out of
videos.
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Seeking
Hi Everyone
Thanks so much for the feedback. The ffmpeg suggestion here by greatgnu
is really very good too. I love the command line and since I j
I've used VLC for cutting clips out of videos. Although the quality of the
clips wasn't fantastic, the quality of the original video wasn't that great
either, and the PC I was doing it all on was pretty old and slow.
The other thing I've seen people recommend for simple tasks like this is
A
My fav one is Kdenlive, but you sould use pitivi for your own purpose.
But you should first consider that the more you ask for quality and format
size, the bigger the resources of your computer will be requested.
This is a very simple equation.
It seems that the
/home/y/kernel/linux-hwe-4.13.0/scripts/ubuntu-retpoline-extract-one script
does something wrong. Why don't you better fo everything manually?
which GCC version are you using?
>my hard drive is a 7200rpm one. Could it be because I have full disk
encryption?
FDE here too and a 7200rpm HD..
/me sends MagiqueB all his bitcoins :)
*which is not much..I'm an europoor :'(
Hi everyone. Since I don't have much knowledge about licenses I wanted to ask
for help in identifying if a TI-licensed software is considered to be free
software.
The software I'm using is ->
https://git.ti.com/processor-firmware/ti-amx3-cm3-pm-firmware/trees/ti-v4.1.y
(see the License.tx
>All I am planning on doing is cutting clips out of
videos.
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Seeking
>lose the sound applet in their panel
They can install several different ones and try and see which one suits them
better. I recommend 'volti'
>and volume buttons might not work unless they are specifically mapped to
amixer commands or something.
This was not the case on my system. They c
Ah ah ah. Tempting, but that still doesn't explain why my kernel takes 39
seconds to boot (kernel alone). Though I would maybe think about getting an
SSD later.
Are you using the standard Trisquel 8 kernel, or is it another Linux-Libre
(maybe the one provided by jxself?).
Thanks.
I prefer Pitivi. OpenShot is pretty nice too.
35 matches
Mail list logo
