From the Xiphos project git page on March 27th -
"Update dependencies (#871) - Sword 1.8+ is now required
Fedora 26 will not ship 1.8
None of the Debian or Ubuntu-based distros currently ship Sword 1.8, either"
Looks like the whole project is at a crossroads on Linux. Wonder what is
happening
I searched for "libbiblesync" at packages.debian.org
It is only available in stable (stretch) and unstable (sid) branches.
Obviously it is (being) deprecated.
Sorry. I already deleted Gnome after testing the snap plugin (and
subsequently re-installed MATE). Would you mind testing it using a virtual
machine by yourself? (Note: without its contrib or non-free repo, Debian can
be considered free/libre.)
Again, I agree that we need a graphical
> Did the Replicant/Android SDK get into Trisquel?
$ apt-cache search android-sdk
android-sdk - Software development kit for Android platform
android-sdk-build-tools - Tools for building Android applications
android-sdk-build-tools-common - Tools for building Android applications -
Common files
I used xiphos before also, try bibletime if that doesn't work.
Did the Replicant/Android SDK get into Trisquel?
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/replicant-project-calls-android-sdk-be-i
ncluded-trisuqel-can-you-help
I was looking at how much work it'd be to manually install it, and I
didn't find any information on the Replicant Wiki. It looks like the
SDK
I borrowed libbiblesync from Debian Stretch when I installed Xiphos.
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=biblesync=names=all=all
I don't know enough about the various licenses to know if libbiblesync's
licensing is a freedom concern. Its 2014 license is "public-domain", and it
has
When I upgraded from 7 to 8, it made me uninstall Xiphos, my Bible app.
Now, I can't even install it.
cal@user-ThinkPad-X200:~/Desktop$ sudo apt install xiphos
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed.
Using Snap to install free software is also going to come with a pretty
significant performance tax on your system. Those packages have quite a bit
of extra baggage they are installing in terms of their sandboxing environment
and the other elements that are required to build and install
excellent, comrades, excellent \o/
Ко мне уже пнишла любовь. Да и нет у меня
повода на нее злиться. Я только-что встал и
уже устал. От любви -- никогда!
Heh, it made me smile :)
> After installing the Snap package plugin, I restarted the system and then
> browsed each category. I didn't see any non-free software immediately. The
> listed packages were largely the same, with or without Snap package plugin
> installed.
Sounds like the situation is better than it is in
Благодарные пользователи Трискел
навсегда торжественно приветствуют Вас
товарищ Дэвид за Ваши услуги.
:)
Hi, friends!
Sorry for this very late reply, I've been really quite busy these last two
weeks and have only performed some minimal Trisquel tasks regarding new users
and similar stuff.
I've read your messages and I'll work into this request, at first I was going
to reply that it would be
Just before I tried to install "gnome-software-plugin-snap", I carefully
checked my "/etc/apt/sources.list" file again to make sure that both
"contrib" and "non-free" repositories were disabled.
After installing the Snap package plugin, I restarted the system and then
browsed each
Thank you for your answer. I can neither boot from legacy mode nor from efi.
I think this is because there is no efi boot partition with a GPT partition
table correctly installed on my hard drive.
I will try with Debian testing.
On the french forum we have found this wich is particularly
> I wonder what would happen if I install
> it manually.
I'm interested to know. Do you mind trying and letting me know?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
19 matches
Mail list logo
