This issue of "you said it is 'libre' but I prove it's not", and even
the issue regarding the older publication on ThinkPenguin's site, can be
easily solved by changing terms/words accordingly there. There's no need
to make everyone mad at each other.
For example, we can publish updates on these p
I'm just going to clarify a couple of points, since these two posts ended up
in a separate thread:
1. tct is complaining about the lack of PCB CAD files for the computer card
(which are not provided as of this time, as the campaign page explains under
the "A Libre Approach" section).
2. t
Very insightful +1
someone downvoted you. :-)
People have done it before, and they will most certainly do it again... so
idk
I just shrug at the idea.
heh, someone upvoted you again so you now on 0. guilty person?
meh
I would be surprised of thinkpenguin would support someone like that.
where are the proves?
tct has been lumping together criticism of Think Penguin's catalog with his
criticism of the EOMA68 campaign. I can't say I know why he is doing this.
On 26.08.2016 04:03, André Silva wrote:
> Hi guys, i let you know that our url about EOMA68 news has been changed
> [0] to fix misleading information there too.
>
> [0]:https://www.parabola.nu/news/new-ryf-seeking-hardware-crowdfunding-project-with-parabola-pre-installed/
That's a good thing. Oh,
If your saying where is the proof, that is my point. There is very little
evidence and its misleading evidence in full.
I am not sure either, I think he just has a vendetta against them or just has
some sort of grudge...
On 26.08.2016 06:22, John Sullivan wrote
> What this *should* be is a discussion among people on the same side to
> refine text and messaging such that it is accurate, approachable, and
> effective. Please make it that.
I believe your or other FSF staff member's comments on the points raised
here
On 26.08.2016 12:46, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Le jeudi 25 août 2016 à 23:22 -0400, John Sullivan a écrit :
>> Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic writes:
>> Below are more attempts of ThinkPenguin to brainwash people.
>>
>> This stops now on this list. ThinkPenguin is not deliberately attempting
>> to brain
Capitalist free-for-all has turned friend into foe
meh they downvoted us... somewhere somebody is either very very miffed, or
cracking up with troll-laughter.
My first attempt was to discuss and suggest better wordings for both
older and upcoming publications. I didn't intend to make accusations and
such.
This is why I sent several messages here suggesting both "parties" of
the discussion to simply analise the issue and, if needed, correct not
only the
Thank you, Ali. I really appreciate you taking the time to answer my
call and share your opinion on the libreplanet-discuss mailing list.
On 26.08.2016 16:28, Ali Razeen wrote:
> If this is true in the libre hardware world,
I follow your logic, but I'm not sure there is an exact analogy libre
sof
On 26.08.2016 19:27, Ali Razeen wrote:
> I follow your argument but to make sure we’re on the same page, let me try to
> rephrase it in my own words so that you can agree or disagree. I believe you
> claim that we cannot say that the EOMA68 is “libre hardware from the
> beginning” because we hav
On 26.08.2016 23:03, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> I have to disagree here. Comparing this to GPL violation is outrageous.
You might be right and the parallelism I made is too extrapolated.
Thanks for noting that.
Tiberiu
Yep mhm...
22 matches
Mail list logo
