http://www.coachsoutletonline-usa.com/ coach outlet usa coach outlet online
http://www.ourcoachoutletonline.com/ coach outlet online usa coach outlet
http://www.newmichaelkorspurse.com/ michael kors purses outlet
http://www.mk-michaelkoroutlet.com/ michael kors outlet online
http://www.guccishoeso
If anybody was holding off on donating to the Sonar Project its down to 30
hours to go!
The project has reach near half its funding goal of just $20,000 USD.
Consider a donation and make this project a reality.
Thanks; I'll try looking for lower quality. My experience is very
consistent; that is, about the first 10 seconds of content, then
silence, no matter how long I sit and wait.
I've had a perfectly fine experience with Abrowser 18. Perhaps it was just
buffering? Note that you will get better loading times if you choose the
"normal" quality instead of the highest quality.
Given my recent experience with unplug and youtube, I cannot second this
recommendation. In most attempts to stream a video, I get a maximum of
10 seconds of playback, then it just stops. There's a browser tab open,
with nothing but 'videoplayback' as an 'mp4' video object.
Cheers,
D
Thanks for pointing that out. I did forget and am pretty sure I read this
from your or others here before.
Thanks for pointing that out. I did forget and am pretty sure I read this
from your or others here before.
I'm not sure the old model generally supported $10,000 license fees. At least
not in USD dollars. Though the new subscription model certainly seems to
think they can get away with it. Not quite sure how that is going to work.
I'm guessing Microsoft will probably discount the subscription for
I thought greasemonkey and linternamagica were free software? They're a
browser extension and user script, respectively.
-Dave
On 02/07/2013 12:35 PM, onp...@gmail.com wrote:
Remember, Chris, that YouTube always requires nonfree software, namely
the nonfree Javascript. To really watch w
Remember, Chris, that YouTube always requires nonfree software, namely the
nonfree Javascript. To really watch without nonfree software, you need to
download the video with something like UnPlug (a Firefox extension which I
really recommend for this; it's really easy, and you can also stream
He is well spoken does make a lot of good points about the need for these
tools to be free software. He does bring to light another problem where a
software company develops a piece of software, gets selfish by charging like
$10,000 per license, and therefore is out of the reach of the averag
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/262604?c=activity
He goes on to explain the value of free software for anybody who is
questioning his motivation.
Well if he does pull this off and is a success over time, then hopefully the
hard work improving accessibility for Sonar gets pushed upstream to the
Debians and the Fedoras and Archs. If it does, then good for him and his hard
work wasn't in vain.
The humorous part of all this is I'd normally be making the same general
comment t3g is making about more collaboration and cooperation. Only this is
probably an example of where it makes sense to produce a distribution
specific to an audience for various reasons (of which others have express
I don't want you to think I am attacking the guy personally, which I am not.
As for your reference to Trisquel, it is unique due to it being the first or
one of the first of its kind to be based off of Ubuntu. You get the huge
community code behind it plus a limitless amount of PPAs.
I orig
On 13-02-05 03:45 PM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
> On 13-02-05 12:43 AM, Dave Hunt wrote:
>> [...] The accessibility features, found in Sonar, are part of the
>> standard GNOME feature set. In the typical out-of-the-box GNOME
>> setup, they're not enabled by default. [...
> Actually, if it's based o
What is wrong with you t3g?
Of all the GNU/Linux distributions to dismiss, why would any sane person
chose to dismiss Sonar?
Sonar is pursuing a niche but very real demographic. Unfortunately, my guess
is that most people who need technical accessibility are not aware of the
benefits of G
Giving people control of certain aspects is really beneficial to moving
things along. But besides that it'll probably be a lot easier for him to
attracting funding. Particularly from sources that would not otherwise
normally donate to a free software project/foundation/etc.
Yea-
I'm not terribly concerned with how he uses the funds. It isn't like he is
out to hinder free software in any way and whatever is done should only help.
He knows the problems, he is concerned, and regardless of what is done I'm
sure freedom is at the tip of his mind. You have to start
On 13-02-05 12:43 AM, Dave Hunt wrote:
> [...] The accessibility features, found in Sonar, are part of the
> standard GNOME feature set. In the typical out-of-the-box GNOME
> setup, they're not enabled by default. [...
Actually, if it's based on Ubuntu they're part of the standard "Ubuntu's
Gnom
I got my impression about this not being 100% free from the other comments
about him being somewhat vague on the complete freedom of the distro. On top
of that, he is creating a distro on the standard Ubuntu releases which the
FSF and RMS himself do not approve. I don't mind Ubuntu, but I kno
You are right that Jonathan isn't interested in locking anything down.
The accessibility features, found in Sonar, are part of the standard
GNOME feature set. In the typical out-of-the-box GNOME setup, they're
not enabled by default. I find Sonar, in its current state, redundant,
and do not
Where did you get this idea he was locking down the distribution? His whole
reason for doing this is the exact opposite of that. Your pulling stuff out
of the air again as far as I can see. I'm all for more cooperation although I
don't see this benefiting or hurting Trisquel one bit. His goal
If he goes it alone, accessibility could become better than that now
offered by GNOME and the KDE accessibility bridge. I think he plans to
use his foundation to fund accessibility developments and see that they
get into the GNU/Linux ecosystem, not just stay in Sonar.
Sonar is now a Ubuntu r
The big difference is he has control over every aspect of the project if he
goes it alone. As good as Trisquel is accessibility wise it probably wouldn't
ever achieve the level of accessibility that he envisions in this new
distribution.
Sonar is a waste of time and effort.
Why? There are already too many distros out there and instead of a whole new
one to join the crowd, the money he gets should be spent on creating
applications or improving the existing ones.
When these applications are polished to his liking, the big pus
" I inquired about funding the same work in Debian or Trisquel"
Yeah, since he used to help with accessibility in Trisquel, why not
continue doing that? It seems a waste to duplicate effort maintaining
yet another distribution, especially if he was already helping with
accessibility in Trisquel to
Jonathan got accessibility into Trisquel 5.0, for which I am grateful!
I was introduced to Trisquel and Jonathan at Software Freedom Day, I
think it was in 2011. I'm thrilled that accessibility continues to be a
priority!
I don't think he plans for Sonar to be 100% free. The current releases
are respins of Ubuntu and Debian Testing. I wish he had chosen Trisquel
as his base. Perhaps he decided that building a distro that will work on
more hardware, out of the box, is an acceptable compromise, since it
will make
Thank you for mentioning Sonar Project! I'm a monthly donor to the
Accessible Computing Foundation. I also contribute to the Accessible
Freedom wiki, a distribution-independent source for information on
GNU/Linux and accessibility. So far, we have some help pages on getting
started with Tris
>It doesn't say if he plans for Sonar to be 100% free though.
Mr
Mr. Nadeau has worked with Mr. Rodríguez on accessibility in Trisquel in the
past. He's also worked as an intern at the FSF, and in the video he says
Sonar will be free as in freedom, and he made a point to mention the
advanta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 13-02-04 04:02 PM, ch...@thinkpenguin.com a écrit :
> I thought I'd point people to a new project that aims to create a
> distribution focused on improving
access to GNU/Linux and free software for peoples with various disabilities:
>
> http://igg
It doesn't say if he plans for Sonar to be 100% free though.
I thought I'd point people to a new project that aims to create a
distribution focused on improving access to GNU/Linux and free software for
peoples with various disabilities:
http://igg.me/p/sonar-project/x/2332188
I believe the person behind this is a well known individual in this communi
34 matches
Mail list logo
