Teaching about freedom is not much use if there is no free OS that people can
actually install.
It is sensible to support the distro with the biggest userbase, which
trisquel is.
Some people of other distros might be offended by that or feel kinda down,
but that is a minor issue compared to
What is more important for free software than having a 100% free system?
If the fsf spends money on anything, shouldn't the trisquel project be on the
very top of the list, or at least far up there`?
So the problem is actually rather the way the fsf sets its priorities.
In my opinion they *should* use their money for something important as one of
the very few truly free distributions out there.
Nobody can blame Ruben - I'm rather surprised that he is able to maintain the
project at all if