Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-22 Thread tegskywalker
Its not just the developers, but the media has jumped on it as well. Attention has definitely focused to mobile as they think of a desktop or laptop as cumbersome and not needed. Even Microsoft knows this and why they are pushing Windows 8 on the tablet so hard. I even saw an article about

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-21 Thread adrian . malacoda
There's some pretty heavy misunderstanding about this story (not necessarily here but elsewhere on the web). Mozilla won't actually be licensing any patents; it's just going to use OS-level or hardware-level decoding where available. Can't say I blame them, honestly. I'm not even too

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-20 Thread alonivtsan
H.264 isn't going away anytime soon since unlike WebM it can be decoded via GPU. Mozilla wishes to expand its browser's market share on mobile devices which rely on video decoding via GPU, so they must support H.264 via HTML5 on their mobile versions, since they cannot support it via the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-20 Thread chris
Mozilla should drop support for Adobe Flash on Microsoft Windows as Adobe has done for GNU/Linux. There would probably be a fight given that it isn't Mozilla that is supporting it exactly. Mozilla blocking the plug-in and treating it as malicious (which it is) on each update would put a

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-20 Thread Igor . Zobin
I'd love to see that, the Windows version of Firefox reporting Flash as a spyware and forcing the user to remove it and never install it again.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-20 Thread mikko . viinamaki
This makes H.264 a bit tricky in certain countries: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264#Patent_licensing

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-20 Thread alonivtsan
Mozilla does support Adobe Flash - if you visit a website that requires Flash on FireFox Mozilla recommends the non-free Flash plugin (and not Gnash).

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-20 Thread tegskywalker
So how would this work with Abrowser and IceCat? Do they look for Gstreamer or libavcodec on the system and use them? Or do they continue to block entirely? I say this becuase the Gnash browser plugin will recommend and install the Gstreamer libraries for the MPEG4 container and the codecs

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-20 Thread alonivtsan
Abrowser uses Gnash which requires Gstreamer and libavcodec (just type aptitude show gnash-common in the terminal to see all the dependencies).

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-20 Thread chris
That isn't entirely correct. Neither was my statement though. It is more or less what they did in any event. I'm pulling this from my head. Feel free to reply with corrections. Provided my memory serves me correctly this is the details of the press release: Adobe has said they are dropping

Re: [Trisquel-users] Firefox may support H264 after all

2012-03-19 Thread tegskywalker
I can't edit my original post so here is another link supporting my original: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2012/03/video-mobile-and-the-open-web/