> I'd think that Trisquel could go with Icecat for a semi-rolling browser.
> It helps that it's kind of already a stable version, plus all the
> stronger privacy features it offers.
I agree that with LTS packages like Icecat it's fine stability-wise to
upgrade to the latest version, and might be
I'd think that Trisquel could go with Icecat for a semi-rolling browser. It
helps that it's kind of already a stable version, plus all the stronger
privacy features it offers.
> I run trisquel in my
> T400s and X220 and I have had no issues (other than the usual issues with
> updating to Abrowser 64).
It sounds like you've stumbled onto one of the advantages of an LTS
distro. Abrowser is one of the few packages in Trisquel that is rolling,
so occasionally an update
Thanks for the explanation. This helps to clear out why Trisquel freezes its
software versions. Personally I preferred the "rolling release" approach,
then I decided to go 100% free software and got to know Trisquel, it is now
my favorite distro, I run a small server powered by Trisquel and
Yes there is always a reason for everything. Package versions are frozen on
the release of a given version of Trisquel. Other distros, like Debian, do
the same with their stable releases. Security and bug fixes can be applied by
applying specific fixes the overall version number remains the
Is there a reason why GnuPGP on Trisquel is still on the older 2.1.11
release? When i try to update through terminal i get "gnupg2 is already the
newest version (2.1.11-6ubuntu2.1)".,which is way behind the current 2.2.12
release.
