[Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-24 Thread santiago . lorente
Any recommendation for any Spotify-like service? What about Atraci? I've been told it's "open source". Is it free software? I have not seen it in the Trisquel repo.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-24 Thread shiretoko
Atraci is licensed under the MIT license, so it's free software. It's not in the normal ubuntu repos afaik, so that might be the reason why it's not in trisquel. That said, it basically plays the sound of youtube videos... which is really nice, but it's not a real streaming service like spotif

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-24 Thread davidvargas1
Jane and quantumgravity The way I record my music is by using Audacity through my sound card, then I'll converted to the file of my desire and saved it to my Server or usb. Audacity is free. Any sound, song/lyric even my own breathing I record. , I could catch it without worries of DRM. U

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-24 Thread jpl
I use Minitube, which is simply for watching Youtube videos- pretty much any song anyone wants to listen to is on Youtube. You can also download the songs via Minitube, and convert them to ogg, if you like.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-25 Thread Alexander Stephen Thomas Ross
magnatune's nice html5 player http://greattuneplayer.jit.su/ I use it all the time for listening to new releases. https://libre.fm when I want to listen to all sorts stuff thats different from my usual. i download jamendo albums in flac (yes they do provide flacs but only via there api!) heres a

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-25 Thread maestro
I have 60 gigs of prog rock and I want mre :)

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-27 Thread tkmantz625
We should all place as much importance on the licenses of the music as we do for music-related programs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_music

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-27 Thread jpl
Why? Art is non-functional, software is functional. It is vital for software to be free, but it isn't for music and art to be.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-27 Thread Andrew Roffey
jpl: > Why? Art is non-functional, software is functional. It is vital for > software to be free, but it isn't for music and art to be. This is true. But there are other issues with copyright with regards to music that are addressed by RMS in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNBMdDaYh

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-27 Thread jpl
Yea, I've heard his lecture on Copyright VS Community; I agreed with it, but RMS doesn't say nor think that all music must be free.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Music on the fly

2014-12-27 Thread Andrew Roffey
jpl: > Yea, I've heard his lecture on Copyright VS Community; I agreed with > it, but RMS doesn't say nor think that all music must be free. The point is not that all music should be free, but that the copyright system as it exists today unnecessarily takes away freedom that makes free music desi