Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-07 Thread alonivtsan
Another option is replacing embedded videos with a link which the LinkTube Greasemonkey user script does: You can get it here (it requires Greasemonkey or Scriptish to work): http://isebaro.com/linktube/?ln=en http://isebaro.com/linktube/include/files/linktube.user.js Greasemonkey:

Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-06 Thread onpon4
I think there's some confusion about this extension being expressed. No Flash is not like ViewTube or Linterna Magica. ViewTube and Linerna Magica replace the official video players of various video hosts with an unofficial free/libre one. No Flash does something completely different; it

Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-06 Thread davesamcdxv
ViewTube doesn't affect embedded videos at all Ah, I completely forgot about that part! I'll probably reverse my decision then.

Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-06 Thread legimet . calc
I plan to install Parabola when I get time (I already have it on a VM). I don't know how often it breaks, but there are a lot of things that require manual intervention.

Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-06 Thread bentonhurley
onpon4 is 100% correct in his assessment, this will just act as a complementary add on to your others, such as View Tube. Also, I think he pretty well summed up everything for the wiki, I don't know of anything else to add. Many thanks for that as well, by the way.

Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-06 Thread bentonhurley
No problem, sorry I just had time to respond. Anyway, my experience with Parabola has been that it's *fairly* stable, insofar as giving you a working base system. Every now and then, and update will break a package (not a necessary one, maybe an emulator or game, something like that). The

Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-06 Thread davesamcdxv
I'm hoping Manjaro will consider doing an FSF compliant spin based on Parabola down the line I second that - MAnjaro was easily stable enough during the time it spent as my last not-so-free tenure with GNU/Linux. Would've stayed there had it had a fully free variant.

Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-05 Thread bentonhurley
*Sorry, just checked the actual add on page, and it is under the Mozilla Public License 2.0

[Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-05 Thread bentonhurley
The source code is on GitHub, but I'm not sure about the license. I'm actually a Parabola GNU/Linux-libre user, but I thought it would be worth mentioning here as well. The add on is called NoFlash: http://www.figuiere.net/hub/blog/?2014/06/04/849-hack-the-web-no-flash There is no

Re: [Trisquel-users] New Mozilla-based browser add on that is similar to the old FlashVideoReplacer.

2014-06-05 Thread davesamcdxv
Sorry about being a bit off-topic Ben but how Stable/unstable is Parabola and how often does it break, if it does break often, and what kind of breakage would that usually be?