Check rawtherapee.com
Hate Microsoft and all .Net trashware.
Sorta, while the code is free it's got Micro$ofts patents hanging heavy over
it. Thus it's probably not a good idea to rely on mono software. Tomorrow it
all might be gone.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_%28software%29#Mono_and_Microsoft.27s_patents
Oh, true, I remember that in Photoshop as well. I've never bothered with it
because I never had to,
and of course because I didn't know what it was for.
Well I knew about (s)RBG and CMYK, but I didn't think of these as color
profiles for some reason.
So since most screens are innacurate
No. It's rather that Mono belongs in the C# ecosystem, so even if it is free,
it is code firmly under the thumb of Microsoft.
I guess one thing is f-spot depends on mono.
I was merely suggesting the method for installing a profile.
Yeah I know, I'm simply reminiscing the past ;)
If you want them to look the same across different monitors,
you're going to have a hard time since most monitors aren't accurate in color
display and/or aren't calibrated.
You'll often have slight differences with any image on the web, to my
knowledge.
Regarding the printer, I have no
I think you can embed the color profile into the image you put up for display
on the web. Not sure if you can do that with jpgs but when I open images in
gimp sometimes it says if you want to use a different color profile than
which is embedded with the photo. When I was taking photography
What is wrong with mono? non free?
um the adding icc profile in gimp shows you how to install non free adobe
color profile. There is a free version of this called adobe 1998 compatible
profile in the package icc-profiles-free.
photocrap? GIMP RULES! :)
Why is shotwell all of a sudden recommended over the older ones that came
before it? Well shotwell seems to be a new comer. What features makes it
better than let's say f-spot?
So the images look the same across different monitors and when I print them
out on a printer they look as close as possible to how they look on the
screen. This is how I do it with proprietary software I just use the same
color profile with the screen as the printer and then it usually comes
So the images look the same across different monitors and when I print them
out on a printer they look as close as possible to how they look on the
screen. This is how I do it with proprietary software I just use the same
color profile with the screen as the printer and then it usually comes
So that's dealing with CMYK to RGB?
How do you do it in a proprietary software?
I mean what is your goal exactly?
Is it to have a printed picture,
and to use it to make the sRGB version look as close as possible
(provided your screen is rather neutral, and calibrated)?
I think GIMP has "some"
What should I use for Color management?
gnome-color-manager or dispcalgui?
Color management is used so that the image you see on the screen is the same
on different monitors or when printing out a photo.
What are all the programs that a professional photographer would use if he
had to only use free software?
Is their a meta package to install it all? How do I request this feature in
trisquel?
19 matches
Mail list logo
