Re: [Trisquel-users] Public consultation on "open" internet

2018-02-05 Thread alonivtsan
The page works fine here as well, using Seamonkey with scripts turned off in NoScript.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Public consultation on "open" internet

2018-02-05 Thread ar018
> This page shows up blank. The page renders OK, including the feedback form at the end, in both Midori (JS disabled) and Dillo (no JS at all). Any chance that your browser might be blocking not only the JS code, but the whole page when it encounters a page with non-free JS?

Re: [Trisquel-users] Public consultation on "open" internet

2018-02-05 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
The page unfortunatelly does require non-free JS, but it's not a fault of Replicant, in fact it's fault of WordPress and related theem projects they're using. however, this shouldn't render the page blank. In my test it was visible, and I'm running GNU IceCat 52.3.0 with GNU LibreJS 6.0.13.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Public consultation on "open" internet

2018-01-14 Thread Caleb Herbert
> https://blog.replicant.us/2017/12/contributions-to-arcep-work-on-terminal-devices-and-public-consultation/ This page shows up blank. Could someone with the knowledge please evaluate the JavaScript on that page, and tell me the legal status of each? signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: [Trisquel-users] Public consultation on "open" internet

2018-01-06 Thread fil . bergamo
And here's a direct link to the actual public consultation: https://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=13142=1

[Trisquel-users] Public consultation on "open" internet

2018-01-06 Thread fil . bergamo
Hi everyone, this is just a heads-up to a post on Replicant's blog regarding a public consultation about the importance and role of various kind of terminal devices in respect to users' rights and internet access. As the article suggests, this is an important occasion to speak in favour of