So, is that true which Gtk2 is being deprecated? GNOME has deprecated Gtk2
for years, but this is well criticized the Gtk+ backward compatibiltiies over
Gtk2 are ‘‘worse than worst’’, this needs to be just why LXQt leaves
Gtk+ and Bugdie needs to experiment in LXQt as to quit Gtk+.
A number o
IKR? :(
You have people who use Fuckbook? That site's malicious, proprietary
JavaScript is almost as bad as Facebook's.
No, the version of Qupzilla in the repo is still the version that uses
QtWebKit; this is true even of Ubuntu 16.04. The engine switch was more
recent. It's definitely insecure, though, because QtWebKit is insecure.
Are we sure that there is actually proprietary software in this, though? I
k
Xfce is transition, a looong one.
How ‘‘libre’’ this Falkon will be can’t be assessed? It is
migrating QupZilla from a Qt-only platform into KDE, but KDE is not Qt only,
instead needs to integrate between Qt and Gtk+/Gtk2, however by how much this
matters?
Basically, the "freeness" of Falkon/QupZilla cannot be assessed due to
Yes I have heard QupZilla is integrating into KDE this summer, but not which
KDE needs QupZilla to replace their aging Konqueror, though I of course know
Konqueror was aging. Anyway I still dont see what QupZilla will be and
related names in the KF5 or KDE5 flags of apps from my Parabola syst
Your information seems out of date gd-scania
Firstly, QupZilla is no more. The project has formally joined KDE and is now
known as Falkon. The versions of Qupzilla in the repos are old and will be
deprecated. Secondly, Flakon will not be using QtWebKit anymore as it has
also been depreciate
Flidas (i.e. T8) has liberated QupZilla by erasing these Google nonfree
libraries (Google has licensed Chromium into MIT and MPL but not GPL,
mis-tolerating Chromium to the nonfree deps), but Parabola has not updated
QupZulla since this March, this is here I am requesting Parabola to follow
Do the versions of QupZilla in Trisquel and Parabola have these non-free
components?
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtwebengine-features.html
I was puzzled to what are nonfree from QupZilla for weeks, but ultimately I
have now a moment to prove what few people here are discussing.
The only nonfree elements in QtWebEngine, hence QupZilla are
PepperFlashPlayer libraries and few Chromium
11 matches
Mail list logo
