Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : FSDG and pip

2018-09-09 Thread Mason Hock
> However, I do not really know how to add add-ons on > https://trisquel.info/en/browser/addons I'm not sure either. I've sent David an email asking how. > That is because the backslash is the escape character for 'grep' which is > given the license name to search in the accept/reject files.

[Trisquel-users] Re : FSDG and pip

2018-09-08 Thread lcerf
so I tried out in addition to your y/n options adding a 'v' option to view the text of the license and an 'o' option to add only the current addon without accepting other addons with the same license statement. Nice! I guess we could organize a day where volunteers on this forum would

[Trisquel-users] Re : FSDG and pip

2018-09-07 Thread lcerf
Mozilla requires a license statement and provides a clearly defined set of options I was not aware of that. I thought the license name was a free text field. That may mean the two small scripts (in the attached archive) I wrote some time ago may be modified to automatically list the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : FSDG and pip

2018-09-06 Thread Mason Hock
> Maybe an issue could be filed to propose to adopt a machine-readable > license format. Maybe that of Debian's packages: > https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ which > itself uses the SPDX License List, i.e., https://spdx.org/licenses/ That would be a massive

[Trisquel-users] Re : FSDG and pip

2018-09-06 Thread lcerf
RMS wrote: We should look for volunteers to make replacement repositories for a couple of them, based on automatic filtering not manual vetting. https://lists.libreplanet.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2016-04/msg00078.html Maybe an issue could be filed to propose to adopt a