Indeed. Pyllyukko, who is quite paranoid but honest, even keeps the
protection against phishing that Safe Browsing brings:
https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js
Honesty is what is probably lacking to somebody who, on one hand, pretends to
be concerned about Google learning too much from
A: I see no issue with this at this point. Previously (before WebExtensions)
any extension could enable that or make changes to any other preference, but
that is all sandboxed away now.
*Third-party* attacks concern*ed* RMS. Not Mozilla. Not anymore.
As you see - just mitigations, not a
analytics.js is not 10M lines of code.
"Unminify"
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/chrome/test/data/chromeproxy/extension/google-analytics-bundle.js
(about 1300 lines of code) all you want and try to rewrite part of it in
understandable JavaScript (with meaningful
But you can unminify it. That's what I meant. It is still difficult to read
due to the non-descriptive variable and function names but that is surely
easier to reverse engineer than a binary code.
Are you the same person who pretends that freedom 1 is not practical because
it is too much
These make me think that the analytics may be part of the Android version or
Chrome (where I assume that being tracked is inevitable).
I see no reason why the Android version of Chromium would "need" Google
Analytics more than the desktop versions.
BTW if
I don't think it is not part of the browser (is it?).
They are like embedded dependencies. "third_party" contains 3,726,248 lines
of codes, according to 'sloccount'. They are not included for nothing.
Unclear to who? Some lawyer? Seems pretty clear to me. Do you really want a
lawyer to tell you what software to use? Or a layman who fails to understand
legal terms?
I really want the lawyer. The layman may be somebody who believes he
understands everything after looking at one single
