[Trisquel-users] Re : Why do some old kernels still stay?

2015-11-18 Thread lcerf
You can remove the 3.13 kernels. One single kernel is enough (assuming you are sure it boots!). The package manager would prevent you from removing all kernel images.

[Trisquel-users] Re : Why do some old kernels still stay?

2015-11-18 Thread lcerf
It is normal: by default, GRUB is configured to always use the latest kernel image and 'sudo update-grub' is automatically run after you install such an image.

[Trisquel-users] Re : Why do some old kernels still stay?

2015-11-18 Thread lcerf
The headers are indeed optional (and not installed by default, in Trisquel 7 at least). I think they are useless unless you compile modules for the kernel.

[Trisquel-users] Re : Why do some old kernels still stay?

2015-11-18 Thread lcerf
I see no reason why the 3.4 image would stop booting.

[Trisquel-users] Re : Why do some old kernels still stay?

2015-11-19 Thread lcerf
It is not that painful: just search "linux-image" and click on the header of the "S" (for "Status") column to get the installed packages at the beginning of the list.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : Why do some old kernels still stay?

2015-11-18 Thread moxalt
That is indeed normal behaviour. I do not consider that having my GRUB configuration 'messed up'. My question still stands: in what way do kernel updates mess up his GRUB configuration? Even though it runs an update-grub, this does not affect the contents of /etc/default/grub, the primary configura