What do you think about these OS?
Why haven't they still been approved?
> What do you think about these OS?
Nothing.
> Why haven't they still been approved?
Have they officially asked to be included in the list? If yes, then they just
must be patient. Of course if the process is taking years then maybe a poke
is in order.
LibertyBSD has applied if you read the
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2015-02/threads.html#00018
As for Uruk 1.0 it's not applied (unless i'm mistaken)
https://uruk.tuxfamily.org/dist/en.html#about
Librepup as well(?)but this project is often even unreachable by internet
It's worth noting that LibertyBSD is not a GNU distribution, so it wouldn't
be listed on gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html, but rather on
gnu.org/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html.
Also to qualify, the OS must be self-hosted and build its own packages so
that it is independent. This disqualifies Librepup.
Yep, and that's not until their problems are fixed: Last time it was
evaluated the installer doesn't actually install LibertyBSD. It installs
OpenBSD instead!
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2016-02/msg1.html
has a link to a screenshot.
They replied saying they'd
C'est exact Monsieur Root ;-)
Self hosted
It's own repositories (?)
& packages
I think that if it is self-hosted by definition it should have its own
repositories if it is building its own packages.
Although I think if you wanted a distribution on a shoestring you could make
it completely source-based and just specify how things are built, rather like
the Gentoo package
