This is what we need...
LXQT sounds like what we need.
Gtk2 is outdated. Gtk3 is the feature and it is great they support it soon.
Xfce always did drain power more than Lxde and various window managers. To be
honest Gtk is not going to make much difference compared to screen
brightness, WiFi etc.
I really hope they don't go to GTK3 though, as it drains battery power more
than GTK2 according to what I have heard about it.
As I write this, I am using Uruk 32-bit edition on my laptop, having a Core 2
Duo processor and 3 gb ram; The running Mate desktop is very fast, and
applications seem to load more quickly than they would, even in the stock
Triisquel 7. I had trouble getting orca to run on my two older
MATE is better I think. It runs on old computers reasonably well and is as
easy, if not easier than GNOME Shell. And more recent versions of MATE have
GTK3 Support, and in future they plan to support Wayland. This is a good
option I think.
For the live image, go with GNOME Shell; it works and is accessible; I just
don't like all that overhead. If you can get speech and braille into the net
install, as Debian has done, and offer all the desktops, with whatever
accessibility they support, I think everyone's covered.
> What do you want to contain in it
How do you want it to be
Based on the next Debian stable with the Pantheon DE by default. Can you do
that for me? :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lB4QDWVIMM
XFCE will be the default
but we Thinking to make Custom iso for users nede accessible (for me I cant
use XFCE)
but I confused what to use
yes we Thinking about using it as default
but The big problem is
for me I prefer GNOME Shell
its so accessible
What is the best for you
Mate or GNOME Shell?
I haven't tried xfce lately, but last time I did, the panel and file manager
weren't accessible, though all the apps I tried seemed to be so. Xfce's nice
and fast, however, and may be the best option, for the default de, if you're
planning to accommodate light-weight systems.
> Maybe an accessible login greeter, such as the one used in Trisquel?
ok
> How about an accessible net installer, such as in Debian?
we will try
> I'd suggest sticking to Mate
> 1.12, based on problem reports that latelyh come up on Sonar GNU support
forum.
its not best to use Mate
We will
Maybe an accessible login greeter, such as the one used in Trisquel? How
about an accessible net installer, such as in Debian? I'd suggest sticking
to Mate 1.12, based on problem reports that latelyh come up on Sonar GNU
support forum. if you are sticking with Mate, how about including
hi
we will start to develop uruk gnu/linux 2.0
What do you want to contain in it
How do you want it to be
All suggestions Ar welcome
and we will try to implement all suggestions
have fun and be free
ali miracle
13 matches
Mail list logo