Librewolf browser looks promising to me. Thanks Caleb and Masonhock.
It's a privacy-focused Firefox derivative.
https://librewolf-community.gitlab.io/
On 12.8.2020 15:44, ma...@masonhock.com wrote:
> In LibreWolf with JS blocked via NoScript,
What’s LibreWolf?
--
Caleb Herbert
KE0VVT
(816) 892-9669
https://bluehome.net/csh
It has something to do with CSS. In LibreWolf with JS blocked via NoScript,
youtube.com looks like it did in ungoogled-chromium. But if I hit Alt to
display the titlebar menu, go to View -> Page Style and change "Basic Page
Style" to "No Style", it disables CSS for that page and I can see
> You should complain to the administrators of the sites distributing nonfree
JavaScript...
I think what the OP is saying is that text-based browsers do a better job of
handling some JS-heavy sites than graphical browsers do with JS blocked.
I have noticed this too. For example, see the
Sorry, forgot to upload the screenshots.
I have definitely seen the number of websites Firefox can't load correctly
increase as all other web browsers shift to Webkit or similar rendering
engines. I think a lot of sites are just not bothering to test for Firefox
anymore or something.
I use Lynx as a secondary browser and
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 01:00:18 +0200 (CEST)
aa...@posteo.net wrote:
> I am sure we all have found some website that is not viewable through
> Mozilla based browsers.
Generally almost all website should be viewable with Abrowser(firefox
based), if it doesn't it is the website's fault not
I am sure we all have found some website that is not viewable through Mozilla
based browsers. I was wondering if anyone also sees a difference when
browsing with text-based browser.
Having javascript restricted in your browser with noscript and/or librejs a
lot of sites look blank and
