*************
The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
************
>
>
>Hi Paul
>I hear what you are saying but you are assuming that someone has the knowledge
>and experience and is an expert on TROM to the degree that they can police the
>technical correctness of posts. i do not have 28 years of Scientology
>auditing experience as Dennis had. i did not spend from 1978 to 1994
>developing TROM. So I will not take on the job of deciding who can post to the
>list based on the correctness of their understanding of TROM.
>
>
>Everyone on the list is their own course supervisor, case supervisor, director
>of processing etc and can judge for themselves whether posters to the list are
>knowledgeable or full of shit. in sorting this out they will become better at
>understanding TROM.
>
>
>My job is to see that posters behave civilly towards each other and put them
>on moderate if they are not.
>
>
>Thank you for your concern.
>
>
>Keep on TROMing
>Pete
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>On Aug 2, 2012, at 7:23 PM, Paul Tipon <pti...@proftitleserv.com> wrote:
>
>
>Hi Pete,
>>
>>
>>Thanks for getting back to me.
>>
>>
>>My intention over and above Slim is to help people get onto and thru TROM. I
>>have no disagreements with Dennis' work. I also am ready and willing to help
>>Slim and anyone get thru TROM.
>>
>>
>>What gets posted on the TROM thread can be very helpful and of course any and
>>all can give wins and pose questions and what they think. However with Slim
>>it has become a matter of invalidating Dennis' work and posting what he
>>states to be truth and Dennis' Tech according to Slim. If he would say,
>>according to Slim, that would be another story entirely. Several times I
>>have pointed out his non-duplication of TROM and the falsities that he posts.
>> He has not corrected at this time so I have upped the gradient.
>>
>>
>>Most of all I feel it is paramount that untruths, falsities and the twisting
>>of Dennis' TROM not be continuously posted with no retractions and most
>>important no learning and correction occurring. Such can only mislead and
>>harm those working to learn, understand and apply TROM. Potentially the TROM
>>thread becomes misleading and wrong and therefore harmful to readers and
>>those working to get through TROM.
>>
>>
>>I understand your concern about keeping people on TROM but when posting can
>>mislead and devalue and destroy TROM, I feel something should be done to
>>adhere to and follow Dennis' cautions. Slim himself posted Dennis' concern
>>and admonition,
>>
>>
>>"2) When you duplicate the data, you duplicate it exactly. Not because I
>>am enamored with my prose style but because altered, it could very easily
>>become just another trap in a universe already abundantly endowed with them."
>>
>>
>>There are those who will try to harm, oppress, suppress and enslave. I feel
>>that when those are spotted and when they are shown the error of their ways
>>and it is to no avail in them changing and correcting, steps should be taken
>>to see that their harm is reduced or eliminated. To do nothing for whatever
>>reason is to agree with their evil intent and actions, to whatever degree but
>>it is agreement.
>>
>>
>>The simple fact is that there is also a degree of invalidation and
>>destruction to TROM and the TROM thread that will occur from this. No
>>quantity of subscribers justifies this nor can a nominal quantity by itself
>>have a correcting effect nor is quantity or lack thereof a justifier for evil.
>>
>>
>>Paul
>>
>>
>>On Aug
>>
>>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
Trom@lists.newciv.org
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
