JD My doctor son tried to join the organization. He was quite taken by some of their blah blas. He was sent a questionnaire he had to fill out -- a pledge to a number of "scientific" conclusions -- some of which he was questioning at the time.
UNITY UNITY UNITY!
JD it pushes a 6000 ye
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:14:54 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ICR does some good (nothing is all bad).
But it pushes a 6000 year old earth and is so closed minded to any
legitimate
considerations as to be very much counter productive.
jt: What would you call
ICR does some good (nothing is all bad). But it pushes a 6000 year old earth and is so closed minded to any legitimate considerations as to be very much counter productive. My doctor son tried to join the organization. He was quite taken by some of their blah blas. He was sent a quest
>> neither of you pay enough
attention ..to notice the take on truth, where scripture says the age to
come is unknown (mystery) apart
>>from the presence of the future [in
Christ]
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:23:29 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Sorry, but I don’t
Judy, you did not answer my question. I could give you many answers to the
new questions you raise, but I don't want to move on until we have some
agreement about the word "likeness" in Romans 8:3.
If Romans 8:3 can ONLY mean that the flesh of Jesus only looked like sinful
flesh but was really
On Friday night and all day Saturday I attended a "Case
for Creation" Seminar with speakers from the
Institute for Creation Research in El Cajon, CA.
which was quite challenging and so interesting.
Both speakers say that most
of the opposition they receive toward what they teach comes f
If I find it I'll send it on.
I know the word in question was "homoousios" which was
used in what they called the filioque which was controversial
then and continued to be controversial validating the
scriptural caution against adding or taking from what
is written. judyt
On Mon, 8 Aug 200
I am not accusing you JD, I am confronting you with
your own words.
Satan is the accuser - remember?? Read Matt
27:45-54 over a few times. jt
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:50:53 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
YOU DID "SAY DAKES." I have many of them along with Dakes and
most all
YOU DID "SAY DAKES." I have many of them along with Dakes and most all of them make this connection. If you cannot remember what you just written, what hope is there for thoughtful discussion.
Ridicule? Yes, I suppose it is. When you make fun of and insult those of us who refer to autho
JD this type of jesting does not become
you.
I did not say Dakes. I said I have a lot of
Bibles with notes by men you would esteem as eminent
scholars - the most recent being a Defender's Bible
notated by Dr. Henry Morris of ICR. You may
not respect his scholarship but he is one of
them. I
If this argument was from another, I would know you were kidding.
Your are now offering "Bible notes" as proof of your position Your are so incredibly inconsistent as to startling. Hey guys !!! Dakes has now been offered as Judy's theological positioning !!
Let me know when yo
Well, it's not posted at the time you made the
claim, but maybe you referenced it at some other time.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 1:04
AM
Subj
I can't remember off the top of my head. It was when I
was researching the creeds; I probably have the source
on a floppy somewhere but would have to search for
it. I know I posted it to the list at the time. jt
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:05:29 -0600 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DH, are your figures correct
about the 100,000 conversions via missionary endeavor?
DAVEH: No John, I don't think they are correct. I merely based that
estimate on what I remember Kevin posting awhile back1.9
conversions per missionary per year. But I am on vacation right now,
and don'
14 matches
Mail list logo
