Out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth
speaks - from both sides.
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:55:45 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but you read Dakes. And I read Barth. I am no
more "of Barth" than you are "of Dakes" so stop with the "you're out and
I am in" games.
If you include yoourself in this statement, a hearty "amen" from the Smithmeister !! -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 05:54:25 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Some thoughts from a master
@mail.innglory.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:25:35 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Some thoughts from a master teacher
I am not of Barth and neither am I of Dakes jt
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:59:50 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what I want to know is what Jesus is saying (
AIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:17:21 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Some thoughts from a master teacher Why is it necessary to understand what Barth is about JD? Because simple folk like you
are busy misunderstanding what Ba
I am not of Barth and neither am I of Dakes
jt
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:59:50 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what I want to know is what Jesus is
saying (present tense)
Read Barth (instead of Dakes)
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is it nec
oughts from a master teacher
Why is it necessary to understand what Barth is about JD?
Because simple folk like you are busy misunderstanding what Barth is about, JT.
OK JD, I should have known better; since Barth is your forte - I leave him to you. I don't care what he
was about
Why is it necessary to understand what Barth is about
JD?
Because simple folk like you are busy
misunderstanding what Barth is about, JT.
OK JD, I should have known better; since Barth
is your forte - I leave him to you. I don't care what
he
was about or what he said or didn't say;
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 14:56:57 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Some thoughts from a master teacher
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:09:34 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:09:34 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"But in respect of the very three elements which are supposed to
vindicate it [theology] as a science, namely,
the idea of unity, the possibility of myth, and the humanistic relevance
of Christianity, it can on
Thanks JD Pastor, BISHOP and NOW Master Teacher![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "But in respect of the very three elements which are supposed to vindicate it [theology] as a science, namely, the idea of unity, the possibility of myth, and the humanistic relevance of Christianity, it can only be
"But in respect of the very three elements which are supposed to vindicate it [theology] as a science, namely, the idea of unity, the possibility of myth, and the humanistic relevance of Christianity, it can only be described as completely empty from the theological standpoint, so that theology
11 matches
Mail list logo
