Am Montag, 9. November 2015 21:04:32 UTC+1 schrieb Timitos: > > On 09.11.2015 20:18, Cédric Krier wrote: > > On 2015-11-09 19:34, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote: > >> Am 09.11.2015 18:45 schrieb "Cédric Krier" > >>> On 2015-11-09 18:21, 'Korbinian Preisler' via tryton wrote: > >>>>> I don't agree, negative amount is a credit note not a cancellation. > >>>>> The cancellation of an invoice is managed the cancellation move. > This > >> is > >>>>> the only way to ensure that the cancellation is really a > cancellation. > >>>>> The amounts can not be modified, the invoice can only be cancelled > >> once > >>>>> etc. > >>>>> > >>>> Could you please again define for me the credit note you are talking > >>>> about? What makes your credit note different from an invoice? > >>> A "credit note" in the future design is just an invoice with an amount > >>> negative > >> Can you please explain me the business case behind such a credit note? > I > >> ask this because i think that we are talking from different things and > i > >> really want to understand your plans as i think that the changes you > plan > >> are really important. > > The usual usage of credit note is to correct mistakes made on invoice or > > to cancel an invoice because it has no reason to exist. > > This is because in many countries cancelling invoices are not allowed. > Ok. Now we are talking. Everything is clear for me now. What you call a > credit note is a cancelation for me and the cancelation you talk about > is just a special case of your credit note for me. > > This also explains why you do not care about the self-billing boolean as > it is not part of your concept. We can keep it out as it is not really > important for the removal of the invoice/credit note type. > > I will try to answer your last posts again as you now solved my > misunderstanding. >
Sorry for the wrong order of my answers. This one should be the first one of my last two messages.
