On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 17/11/11 16:04 +0100, Dominique Chabord wrote:
>> > For me, the simplier solution would be to drop it and just define header
>> > on each reports. For now, it is just a few one that use it.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> will it be si
On 17/11/11 16:04 +0100, Dominique Chabord wrote:
> > For me, the simplier solution would be to drop it and just define header
> > on each reports. For now, it is just a few one that use it.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> will it be simple with multi-company ?
It will be the same issue than no
Le 17/11/2011 13:31, Cédric Krier a écrit :
> For me, the simplier solution would be to drop it and just define header
> on each reports. For now, it is just a few one that use it.
>
> What do you think?
>
will it be simple with multi-company ?
--
tryton@googlegroups.com mailing list
Am 17.11.2011 13:43, schrieb Cédric Krier:
On 17/11/11 13:36 +0100, Jan Grasnick | grasbauer ug wrote:
Am 17.11.2011 13:31, schrieb Cédric Krier:
Hi,
After sometimes, I find that the style on report (especially the company
header) doesn't work as well as expected.
It is very difficult to manag
On 17/11/11 13:36 +0100, Jan Grasnick | grasbauer ug wrote:
> Am 17.11.2011 13:31, schrieb Cédric Krier:
> >Hi,
> >
> >After sometimes, I find that the style on report (especially the company
> >header) doesn't work as well as expected.
> >It is very difficult to manage it and customize it.
> >For
Am 17.11.2011 13:31, schrieb Cédric Krier:
Hi,
After sometimes, I find that the style on report (especially the company
header) doesn't work as well as expected.
It is very difficult to manage it and customize it.
For me, the simplier solution would be to drop it and just define header
on each r
Hi,
After sometimes, I find that the style on report (especially the company
header) doesn't work as well as expected.
It is very difficult to manage it and customize it.
For me, the simplier solution would be to drop it and just define header
on each reports. For now, it is just a few one that us