Re: [tryton] Proteus success

2018-02-11 Thread Cato Nano
ok, I was failing to build the project before running the tests I'm sorry for bothering :-/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/8ffc692a-cb99-4af1-8213-f0f

Re: [tryton] Proteus success

2018-02-11 Thread Cato Nano
I tried on a different computer, in a different environment and I get a different result: Ran 266 tests in 55.654s OK (skipped=6) !! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.c

Re: [tryton] Proteus success

2018-02-11 Thread Cato Nano
Il giorno venerdì 2 febbraio 2018 10:19:18 UTC+1, Sergi Almacellas Abellana ha scritto: > El 02/02/18 a les 08:39, Cato Nano ha escrit: > > That' s my total !! > > > > This is a way saner cycle than creating the xml for the fields, then > > logging in the client, open all the windows to reach th

Re: [tryton] Proteus success

2018-02-02 Thread Sergi Almacellas Abellana
El 02/02/18 a les 08:39, Cato Nano ha escrit: > That' s my total !! > > This is a way saner cycle than creating the xml for the fields, then logging > in the client, open all the windows to reach the new field !! We normally use proteus to create doctest scenarios that ensure the module behaves a

[tryton] Proteus success

2018-02-01 Thread Cato Nano
My Bolletta needed to sport a "Total" field that had to be the sum of a field in its lines. I arranged a draft of a couple clculated field/on_change method and then I tested it in proteus. My draft works ! In [7]: boll.totale /home/catonano/tributi/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/trytond/model