Re: [tryton-dev] Should we remove the workflow engine?

2011-11-28 Thread Albert Cervera i Areny
A Divendres, 25 de novembre de 2011 19:10:48, Cédric Krier va escriure: > Hi, > > Today, I got a talk with Nicolas about the relevance of the workflow > engine in Tryton. > We came to the conclusion that it will be perhaps better to drop it. > So here are the arguments: > > - The Subflow which is

Re: [tryton-dev] Reverse domain

2011-11-28 Thread Cédric Krier
On 28/11/11 21:25 +0100, Udo Spallek wrote: > Hi, > > on the migration to 2.2 I have a problem with reverse domains. > In my 1.8 code I could use a structure like this. But this no longer > works in Tryton 2.2 (see ###): > > class Test(ModelSQL, ModelView): > _name = 'test.test' > > cont

[tryton-dev] tryton: Fix in operator to work with xxx2many (issue186004)

2011-11-28 Thread cedric . krier
Reviewers: , Please review this at http://codereview.tryton.org/186004/ Affected files: M tryton/common/domain_inversion.py Index: tryton/common/domain_inversion.py === --- a/tryton/common/domain_inversion.py +++ b/tryton/comm

[tryton-dev] Reverse domain

2011-11-28 Thread Udo Spallek
Hi, on the migration to 2.2 I have a problem with reverse domains. In my 1.8 code I could use a structure like this. But this no longer works in Tryton 2.2 (see ###): class Test(ModelSQL, ModelView): _name = 'test.test' contact_person = fields.Many2One('party.party', 'Contact Person',

[tryton-dev] sale: Sale date is required only at confirmation for issue1087 (issue188002)

2011-11-28 Thread cedric . krier
Reviewers: , Please review this at http://codereview.tryton.org/188002/ Affected files: M CHANGELOG M sale.py Index: CHANGELOG === --- a/CHANGELOG +++ b/CHANGELOG @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +* Sale date is required only at confirmatio

[tryton-dev] purchase: Purchase date is required only at confirmation for issue1087 (issue189003)

2011-11-28 Thread cedric . krier
Reviewers: , Please review this at http://codereview.tryton.org/189003/ Affected files: M CHANGELOG M purchase.py Index: CHANGELOG === --- a/CHANGELOG +++ b/CHANGELOG @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +* Purchase date is required only at con

Re: [tryton-dev] Should we remove the workflow engine?

2011-11-28 Thread ronald munjoma
Hi Cedric, On 28 November 2011 10:35, Cédric Krier wrote: > On 28/11/11 09:15 +0100, lists.jc.mic...@symetrie.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Le 25 nov. 2011 à 19:10, Cédric Krier a écrit : > > > Today, I got a talk with Nicolas about the relevance of the workflow > > > engine in Tryton. > > > We ca

[tryton-dev] account: Add test for fiscalyear (issue190001)

2011-11-28 Thread cedric . krier
Reviewers: , Please review this at http://codereview.tryton.org/190001/ Affected files: M tests/test_account.py Index: tests/test_account.py === --- a/tests/test_account.py +++ b/tests/test_account.py @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ sys.

[tryton-dev] account: Simplify get/set_account (issue186003)

2011-11-28 Thread cedric . krier
Reviewers: , Please review this at http://codereview.tryton.org/186003/ Affected files: M configuration.py Index: configuration.py === --- a/configuration.py +++ b/configuration.py @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ #This file is part of Tryton

Re: [tryton-dev] Should we remove the workflow engine?

2011-11-28 Thread Cédric Krier
On 28/11/11 09:15 +0100, lists.jc.mic...@symetrie.com wrote: > Hi, > > Le 25 nov. 2011 à 19:10, Cédric Krier a écrit : > > Today, I got a talk with Nicolas about the relevance of the workflow > > engine in Tryton. > > We came to the conclusion that it will be perhaps better to drop it. > > For th

Re: [tryton-dev] Should we remove the workflow engine?

2011-11-28 Thread lists.jc.mic...@symetrie.com
Hi, Le 25 nov. 2011 à 19:10, Cédric Krier a écrit : > Today, I got a talk with Nicolas about the relevance of the workflow > engine in Tryton. > We came to the conclusion that it will be perhaps better to drop it. For those, like me, that don't have any experience with OpenErp, could you please