So for me, changing the GTK for Qt doesn't have sense. We should talk
about writing a new client in QT just like it is managed for sao.
It will be a huge work like sao is and from the experience with sao
there are not really a big interest from developpers to work on such
task (just see the
2014-06-08 1:31 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Évrard nicolas.evr...@b2ck.com:
* Cédric Krier [2014-05-11 00:50 +0200]:
On 11 May 00:15, Nicolas Évrard wrote:
So if anybody wants to contribute, there are some easy tasks (like
the mnemonic problem) and some difficult ones (the cellrenderers, the
Hi,
I want to notice you about this bug in Tryton client [1].
The reason is that if we apply the patch the Database values must to be
fixed (like it must to be fixed when upgrade to 3.2 with this script [2]
In the core modules there isn't any fields.Time field, but in third party
modules yes, of
Hi,
My reporting class return a pdf document :
class MyReport(Report):
__name__ = 'mymodule.myreport'
@classmethod
def execute(cls, ids, data):
# code to create myfile.pdf
...
pdf_buffer = None
with open('myfile.pdf', 'rb') as pdf:
pdf_buffer =
On 10 Jun 13:40, Guillem Barba Domingo wrote:
Hi,
I want to notice you about this bug in Tryton client [1].
The reason is that if we apply the patch the Database values must to be
fixed (like it must to be fixed when upgrade to 3.2 with this script [2]
In the core modules there isn't any
On 10 Jun 05:07, Vincent Mora wrote:
Hi,
My reporting class return a pdf document :
class MyReport(Report):
__name__ = 'mymodule.myreport'
@classmethod
def execute(cls, ids, data):
# code to create myfile.pdf
...
pdf_buffer = None
with
Le mardi 10 juin 2014 14:29:27 UTC+2, Cédric Krier a écrit :
On 10 Jun 05:07, Vincent Mora wrote:
Hi,
My reporting class return a pdf document :
class MyReport(Report):
__name__ = 'mymodule.myreport'
@classmethod
def execute(cls, ids, data):
# code
What is a round map?
For the bugs / patch, I don't think we should clutter the bugtracker
with issue for the gtk3 migration. You could publish codereview with
your fixes.
In this case, I can't help.
Just explain which bug(s) did you find and I'm sure this will help somebody
else to fix it.
where? Create a codereview without source code review?
2014-06-10 16:06 GMT+02:00 Raimon Esteve rest...@zikzakmedia.com:
Just explain which bug(s) did you find and I'm sure this will help somebody
else to fix it.
where? Create a codereview without source code review?
codereview is a source code review...
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
Tel. 93 553
On 04 Jan 17:05, Cédric Krier wrote:
So I have already identified two of them for which I'm looking for your
comments (and I could publish a prototype).
- web_user
The idea of this module is about having a common minimal web user
definition/support. I think such user should be
11 matches
Mail list logo
