@translators, please review this [1] which adds a link to the
"Howto Contribute" page.
[1] http://codereview.tryton.org/12801002
--
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 4:40:03 PM UTC+1, Cédric Krier wrote:
>
> On 09 Dec 16:23, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > 2014-12-09 15:28 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier >:
> > > On 09 Dec 15:05, Simon Klemenc wrote:
> > >> http://codereview.tryton.org/11681002/ might lead to just another
> > >> con
El 09/12/14 a les 19:56, Axel Braun ha escrit:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to migrate our database to a new system, and have
some trouble with the module email_queue. It is in the modules folder:
linux-wy2x:/home/test # dir
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/trytond/modules/ |grep email
Hi,
I'm currently trying to migrate our database to a new system, and have some
trouble with the module email_queue. It is in the modules folder:
linux-wy2x:/home/test # dir
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/trytond/modules/ |grep email
> drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 164 8. Dez 16:31 email_queue
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 4:40:03 PM UTC+1, Cédric Krier wrote:
>
> On 09 Dec 16:23, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > 2014-12-09 15:28 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier >:
> > > On 09 Dec 15:05, Simon Klemenc wrote:
> > >> http://codereview.tryton.org/11681002/ might lead to just another
> > >> con
On 09 Dec 16:23, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> 2014-12-09 15:28 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier :
> > On 09 Dec 15:05, Simon Klemenc wrote:
> >> http://codereview.tryton.org/11681002/ might lead to just another
> >> contributor leaving...
> >
> > Don't understand at all what the problem with this review.
2014-12-09 15:28 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier :
> On 09 Dec 15:05, Simon Klemenc wrote:
>> http://codereview.tryton.org/11681002/ might lead to just another
>> contributor leaving...
>
> Don't understand at all what the problem with this review.
AFAIU the problem is that there seems to be no rule that s
Am 09.12.2014 um 15:28 schrieb Cédric Krier:
On 09 Dec 15:05, Simon Klemenc wrote:
http://codereview.tryton.org/11681002/ might lead to just another
contributor leaving...
Don't understand at all what the problem with this review.
nice attitude!
https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/pulls?q=
On 09 Dec 15:05, Simon Klemenc wrote:
> http://codereview.tryton.org/11681002/ might lead to just another
> contributor leaving...
Don't understand at all what the problem with this review.
> https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed (i dont
> remember having ever read anyt
2014-12-09 14:01 GMT+01:00 :
> On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:40:03 PM UTC+5:30, Cédric Krier wrote:
>>
>> On 09 Dec 10:45, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
>> > On 09/12/2014 01:21, Simon Klemenc wrote:
>> > > so just in case it becomes even more strict and there is no 8771002,
>> > > (please?) could
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 3:40:03 PM UTC+5:30, Cédric Krier wrote:
>
> On 09 Dec 10:45, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> > On 09/12/2014 01:21, Simon Klemenc wrote:
> > > so just in case it becomes even more strict and there is no 8771002,
> > > (please?) could you update the wiki, as its not o
On 09 Dec 12:02, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 11:41, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > 2014-12-09 11:07 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier :
> >> On 09 Dec 10:45, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> >>> Generally, in order to allow faster contributions, core developers
> >>> should avoid writing opp
On 09/12/2014 11:41, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> 2014-12-09 11:07 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier :
>> On 09 Dec 10:45, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
>>> Generally, in order to allow faster contributions, core developers
>>> should avoid writing opposite comments in review. Better reviews will
>>> result
2014-12-09 11:07 GMT+01:00 Cédric Krier :
> On 09 Dec 10:45, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
>> On 09/12/2014 01:21, Simon Klemenc wrote:
>> > so just in case it becomes even more strict and there is no 8771002,
>> > (please?) could you update the wiki, as its not obvious for the dumb but
>> > helpful
On 09 Dec 10:45, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 01:21, Simon Klemenc wrote:
> > so just in case it becomes even more strict and there is no 8771002,
> > (please?) could you update the wiki, as its not obvious for the dumb but
> > helpful folks...
> > maybe in the coding guidelines it
On 09/12/2014 01:21, Simon Klemenc wrote:
> so just in case it becomes even more strict and there is no 8771002,
> (please?) could you update the wiki, as its not obvious for the dumb but
> helpful folks...
> maybe in the coding guidelines it could also be noted that %s is the
> desired string-form
Le 09/12/2014 09:09, Guillem Barba Domingo a écrit :
El 05/12/2014 16:50, "Christophe" mailto:c...@adiczion.com>> va escriure:
>
> Le 05/12/2014 16:16, Sergi Almacellas Abellana a écrit :
>
>> El 05/12/14 a les 15:41, Christophe ha escrit:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is there a way to remove
El 05/12/2014 16:50, "Christophe" va escriure:
>
> Le 05/12/2014 16:16, Sergi Almacellas Abellana a écrit :
>
>> El 05/12/14 a les 15:41, Christophe ha escrit:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Is there a way to remove constrainte put by a "required" clause ?
>>>
>>> In details, I have a field that have a co
18 matches
Mail list logo
