Hi,
in [1][2] we introduce a ``get_singleton()`` method for Singelton
models.
In the modules we always use a patter like this::
Config = pool.get('xxx.configuration')
config = Config(1)
or
Configuration = pool.get('xxx.configuration')
config = Configuration(1)
instead of::
Hi,
I need to override a property field by a function field. All seems all
right but when i call the field my function isn't call. It seems that it
is still the old definition that is called.
Is it possible to make it in 3.4 ?
Regards
--
Christophe
http://adiczion.com
On 16 May 14:20, Udo Spallek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in [1][2] we introduce a ``get_singleton()`` method for Singelton
> models.
> In the modules we always use a patter like this::
>
> Config = pool.get('xxx.configuration')
> config = Config(1)
>
> or
>
> Configuration = pool.get('xxx.co
On 16 May 19:14, Christophe (net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to override a property field by a function field. All seems all right
> but when i call the field my function isn't call. It seems that it is still
> the old definition that is called.
> Is it possible to make it in 3.4 ?
This is really no
Le 16/05/2015 20:41, Cédric Krier a écrit :
On 16 May 19:14, Christophe (net) wrote:
Hi,
I need to override a property field by a function field. All seems all right
but when i call the field my function isn't call. It seems that it is still
the old definition that is called.
Is it possible t
On 16 May 20:39, Cédric Krier wrote:
> On 16 May 14:20, Udo Spallek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in [1][2] we introduce a ``get_singleton()`` method for Singelton
> > models.
> > In the modules we always use a patter like this::
> >
> > Config = pool.get('xxx.configuration')
> > config = Confi
Created ID Activity Title
===
bug
1 week ago 4740 1 week ago tryton doesn't find icons on Ubuntu
bug
2 months ago 4643 1 month ago 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'on ...
bug
2 months ago 4603
