[tryton-dev] Re: install trytond without shell access

2011-05-02 Thread e...@nothmann.com
...and a dedicated server. :) On May 2, 4:53 pm, "e...@nothmann.com" wrote: > Oh, I see... he should have started by explaining that. > > Anyway, I shouldn't rely on a shared hosting with web panel for > anything more than a Joomla, a mail service ... and that'

[tryton-dev] Re: install trytond without shell access

2011-05-02 Thread e...@nothmann.com
Oh, I see... he should have started by explaining that. Anyway, I shouldn't rely on a shared hosting with web panel for anything more than a Joomla, a mail service ... and that's it. Core applications (and I guess an ERP is such thing) deserves a wise installation "by hand". On May 2, 3:51 pm, zo

[tryton-dev] Re: install trytond without shell access

2011-05-02 Thread e...@nothmann.com
Regardless the possible answer why on earth would you need that for - If you are looking at a small company, test purposes or use as standalone for minor or non-critical activities, use NESO locally under Windows, for example, or install it directly in Linux with installation scripts from

[tryton-dev] Re: tryton client using pyjamas

2011-05-02 Thread e...@nothmann.com
> First, I would like to clarify some thoughts about a web client. > The primary client of Tryton should stay the GTK one because it is the best > way (aka thin desktop client) to have great usability, integration, security > and fast responsiveness. >From a technical point of view, we totally agr

[tryton-dev] Re: tryton-windows deprecated?

2011-04-30 Thread e...@nothmann.com
I agree. It should be kept... for now. On Apr 30, 5:08 am, Mathias Behrle wrote: > * Betr.: " [tryton-dev] tryton-windows deprecated?" (Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:08:28 >   +0200): > > > Hi, > > > Is there any one who is using tryton-windows? > > I think we can deprecate it as now Tryton can be build wi