Re: Spin bit discussion - where we're at

2017-11-28 Thread Eggert, Lars
Hi, On 2017-11-29, at 1:26, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote: > There are three possible states for an ECN negotiation: not attempted, > failed, and succeeded. Each of these can add a fractional bit of information > about the client and server TCP implementations. If a server

Re: TCP behavior across WiFi pointers ?

2017-11-28 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, Toerless Eckert wrote: I am primarily thinking that there could be a higher demand for TCP (end-to-end) retransmissions when using WiFi because the L2/WiFi local retransmissions are insufficient. And if so, what the characteristics I don't know of any work you're asking

Re: Spin bit discussion - where we're at

2017-11-28 Thread Brian Trammell (IETF)
hi, David, > On 29 Nov 2017, at 08:52, Black, David wrote: > > > (On first glance, the - user - privacy aspects here seem to be much more > > contained, since ECN is mostly about the network exposing information to > > the end systems, and not vice versa.) > > That

RE: Spin bit discussion - where we're at

2017-11-28 Thread Black, David
> (On first glance, the - user - privacy aspects here seem to be much more > contained, since ECN is mostly about the network exposing information to the > end systems, and not vice versa.) That sounds like the right high-level summary. The fact that a transport protocol implementation