On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:21 AM Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote:
> Thanks Martin for putting out your well compiled thoughts. It is even
> better that you are willing to standing for another term.
>
>
>
> Even though my experience is short I could not agree more with your
> message here. (Let’s see
a) WG:
I think there should be first substantial discussion about the subject matter
on the mailing list (ohttp) before proceeding on a WG request for this work.
b) Draft:
Neither the charter text, nor draft-thomson-http-oblivious provide a (to me)
good persuasive high level explanation or
a) WG:
I think there should be first substantial discussion about the subject matter
on the mailing list (ohttp) before proceeding on a WG request for this work.
b) Draft:
Neither the charter text, nor draft-thomson-http-oblivious provide a (to me)
good persuasive high level explanation or
