Re: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis

2017-07-17 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
apply FEC repair mechanisms. > So that’s why we need some ways like MDI, easy to calculate and be > implemented in the network without having to be a RTP entity or TCP proxy. > > > > > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > Rachel > &

Re: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis

2017-07-17 Thread Ali C. Begen
; like routers, to implement them, e.g., post-repair metrics, which will need > the devices to have the ability to decode and apply FEC repair mechanisms. > So that’s why we need some ways like MDI, easy to calculate and be > implemented in the network without having to be a RTP entity or TCP proxy. >

Re: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis

2017-07-17 Thread Ali C. Begen
> > > BR, > > > > Rachel > > > > > > > > 发件人: tsv-area [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Ali C. Begen > > 发送时间: 2017年7月17日 19:31 > > 收件人: Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com> > > 抄送: tsv-area@ietf.org > > 主题: Re: 答复: Proposal for

Re: 答复: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis

2017-07-17 Thread Huangyihong (Rachel)
: 2017年7月17日 20:17 收件人: Huangyihong (Rachel) <rachel.hu...@huawei.com> 抄送: Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com>; tsv-area@ietf.org 主题: Re: 答复: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis Well, I believe you wanna come up with some metrics for streaming video over http and want t

Re: 答复: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis

2017-07-17 Thread Ali C. Begen
network without having to be a RTP entity or TCP proxy. > > > > BR, > > Rachel > > > > *发件人:* tsv-area [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] *代表 *Ali C. Begen > *发送时间:* 2017年7月17日 19:31 > *收件人:* Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com> > *抄送:* tsv-area@ietf.org > *主题

答复: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis

2017-07-17 Thread Qin Wu
AnyOffice 发件人： Ali C. Begen 收件人： Qin Wu; 抄送： tsv-area@ietf.org; 郑辉; 主题： Re: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis 时间： 2017-07-17 13:02:07 I am really curious about who is using MDI anymore. Can you share data if you have it? RTCP XR is still extensively used and for non-RTP, it is a mixed

Re: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis

2017-07-17 Thread Ali C. Begen
I am really curious about who is using MDI anymore. Can you share data if you have it? RTCP XR is still extensively used and for non-RTP, it is a mixed of several things. -acbegen On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Qin Wu wrote: > Hi, All: > > We like to get a sense of this