It might be unusual but it is valid - I think we should track normal/
abnormal completion like Raymond suggested.
--
Jeremy
On Sep 8, 2006, at 8:11 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Originally we decided against this, as returning exceptions like
this is really bad coding convention and I can't think of
I don't think there is any valid application scenario for this even
if it is technically legal in Java. I would prefer we stick with our
original decision not to support this as anyone doing this in their
application code needs to redesign it anyway. Is there an example of
good design for
Another aspect is do we always model service faults as java exceptions?
For WSDLServiceContract, I think it's more natural to flow the fault data
(for example, an OMElement or SDO corresponding to the fault message).
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL
That seems like a valid reason to do this. Can we please hold of
until Monday since I'm in the middle of changes in that area?
Jim
On Sep 9, 2006, at 12:13 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Another aspect is do we always model service faults as java
exceptions? For WSDLServiceContract, I think it's
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-413?page=all ]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath reassigned TUSCANY-413:
---
Assignee: Meeraj Kunnumpurath
Trying to assign an issue to me.
Typo in code comment
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-413?page=all ]
Meeraj Kunnumpurath closed TUSCANY-413.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This has been fixed already.
Typo in code comment
Key: TUSCANY-413
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=comments#action_12433608
]
Scott Kurz commented on TUSCANY-642:
I'm having two problems w/ this last patch, RevisedInnerCompositeCallback.patch
First, when I try to apply w/:
patch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=comments#action_12433619
]
Jim Marino commented on TUSCANY-642:
Hi Scott,
I already fixed these when I committed the patch. Just sync with the latest
version.
Jim
Composite
I'm receiving the following failures:
Running
org.apache.tuscany.databinding.sdo.DataObject2XMLStreamReaderTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.201
sec FAILURE!
testTransform
(org.apache.tuscany.databinding.sdo.DataObject2XMLStreamReaderTestCase)
Hi, Jim.
You need to rebuild SDO impl to get r441810.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 6:59 PM
Subject: Java SCA Build break
I'm receiving the following failures:
Running
I thought we were working off snapshots of SDO and that we had
decoupled the build process? If not, can we remove this from the main
build?
Jim
On Sep 9, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Jim.
You need to rebuild SDO impl to get r441810.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message
11 matches
Mail list logo
