From whats been posted previously about this I'm still not really clear
exactly how things are going to work. Here's a couple of questions:
Are composites required to use the non-standard dependency element in the
SCDL? I'm hoping not and that there will be a way to get things working
without
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:37 AM, ant elder wrote:
From whats been posted previously about this I'm still not really
clear
exactly how things are going to work. Here's a couple of questions:
Are composites required to use the non-standard dependency element
in the
SCDL? I'm hoping not and that
On 9/15/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
[snip]
In other news, I have just added in support for properties to the Python
extension:
- A composite with a property defined in a component and the associated
.componentType file:
component
Your description of the push optimization potential is great, and I
agree now. Thanks. Do you plan to implement this, or can I help in
some way? Any idea of what timing makes sense? Thanks...PC
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September
On 9/16/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
Good to hear you got it going! :-)
To answer your questions:
On 9/13/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Andy,
I got your
Andrew Borley wrote:
On 9/15/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Borley wrote:
[snip]
In other news, I have just added in support for properties to the
Python
extension:
- A composite with a property defined in a component and the
associated
.componentType file:
