On Sep 23, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
If we want interop can't we say use binding.ws since binding.sca
isn't really meant for interop but for optimization and
abstraction of the physical binding? I
I'm working on exporting ChangeSummary as XML whose format is specified by
SDO specs.
There're some deatils that seem not clarfied yet and are kind-of blocking
me.
Please help to clarify; all issues are programming language neutral.
3-1. This one is less SDO specific and more XML generic.
Even
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 23, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
If we want interop can't we say use binding.ws since binding.sca
isn't really meant for interop but for optimization and abstraction
of the
