Re: Why do we need binding.sca?

2006-09-24 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Sep 23, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Jeremy Boynes wrote: On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Jim Marino wrote: If we want interop can't we say use binding.ws since binding.sca isn't really meant for interop but for optimization and abstraction of the physical binding? I

Please help to clarify some details in (X)Path format and ChangeSummary XML format

2006-09-24 Thread Yang ZHONG
I'm working on exporting ChangeSummary as XML whose format is specified by SDO specs. There're some deatils that seem not clarfied yet and are kind-of blocking me. Please help to clarify; all issues are programming language neutral. 3-1. This one is less SDO specific and more XML generic. Even

Re: Why do we need binding.sca?

2006-09-24 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jeremy Boynes wrote: On Sep 23, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Jeremy Boynes wrote: On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Jim Marino wrote: If we want interop can't we say use binding.ws since binding.sca isn't really meant for interop but for optimization and abstraction of the