I'm getting this failure when I'm running the mvn:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
Missing:
--
1) incubat
DAS Status file should be updated
-
Key: TUSCANY-890
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-890
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java DAS RDB
Affects Versions: Java-M2
The down side of this is that the DAS will re-register the types on
every call to Command.execute(), whereas if this is in the user's
hands it can be done once per application and then referenced by URI.
At the moment, I believe that this would also cause us to reintroduce
a direct dependency on E
I have created the following JIRA :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-890
I'd appreciate if someone could help me with that, in order for me to create
the DAS RC, so I can submit it to vote.
- Luciano
It's first time I heard about Cargo, so I'm not the best one to judge
it.
I'm Not sure what your requeirements are, so, I just want to mention that
java/das/testing/tomcat does all these things + configuring datasources in
TC + integration test using htmlUnit to exercise DAS as a user to Comp
I think I run into same issue while playing with BigBank... where I had to
register the types with SDO first..
Yes, this sounds like a good enhancement... to have DAS taking care of the
registration part, as long as it's registered in the DAS config... and would
make the customer experience much
Ok. I'll commit the changes now.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: Bumping version for trunk
+1 for SDO
On 30/10/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I talked to Je
Ok, I lied. I actually went for the low hanging fruit and took care
of 2. I posted patch 'Simpl...7.patch' for TUSCANY-642.
On 10/31/06, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I may not be as quick with these changes this time but I
can takecare of them. I probably will do 1 (and per
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation7.patch
This patch eliminates the need for AbstractOperationOutboundInvocationHandler
by refactor
+1 for SDO
On 30/10/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I talked to Jeremy and I'll take over this task.
There will be two items:
1) Update pom/parent/pom.xml to be a newer version as
"2-incubator-SNAPSHOT"
to reflect two changes made in the file:
a) Add http://ws.zones.apac
In writing up some documentation around the use of the RDB DAS with
Static Types I noticed something a bit clunky. Here is a current
exampleout of the RDB DAS test suite:
public void testUserProvidedModel() throws SQLException {
*SDOUtil.registerStaticTypes(CustomerFactory.class);*
Thanks Kelvin,
I attached the XML instance documents (testdata.zip) referenced from the
junit test XMLDataObjectTest.java
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829
The archive consists of the following documents:
- catalog-10.xml
- w3_sample.wsdl
- lists.xml
- simple.xml
We
Yes Geoff, that does sound feasible. All of the cxxtest Macros (asserts
etc...) will need to be removed. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Geoffrey Winn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:30 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apach
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829?page=all ]
Bryan Luoma updated TUSCANY-829:
Attachment: testdata.zip
attaching XML instance documents referrenced from XMLDataObjectTest.java
- catalog-10.xml
- w3_sample.wsdl
- lists.xml
- simple.xml
Ok, I may not be as quick with these changes this time but I
can takecare of them. I probably will do 1 (and perhaps 2) in one
chunk and 3 in another. Who knows, perhaps my commit rights will
be ready by the time I do one or both and I won't have to post
patches ...
On 10/31/06, Jim Marino <[EMA
Add a new codegen option to generate static SDO APIs using StAX parser
--
Key: TUSCANY-889
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-889
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hi Jim,
The changes sound reasonable, with a few comments.
1. Target invokers for binding.axis2, specifically on the reference
side, invoke an axis2 operation client as non-blocking, and in the
case of Axis2AsyncTargetInvoker, also sets
Hi Jim,
The changes sound reasonable, with a few comments.
1. Target invokers for binding.axis2, specifically on the reference
side, invoke an axis2 operation client as non-blocking, and in the
case of Axis2AsyncTargetInvoker, also sets up the callback
target invoker given to the operation clien
You may have thought of this already but it would be good to consider
how SDO might play with this JPA integration.
--
Kevin
Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
I have made a start on JPA integration. Haven't got to do much because
of the build problems. The current home is
sca/services/persisten
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829?page=comments#action_12445937
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-829:
It would appear that the apache infrastructure issues that are happening at the
moment means that the subversion
Hi,
I have made a start on JPA integration. Haven't got to do much because
of the build problems. The current home is
sca/services/persistence/common.
Anyway, this is a brief highlight of my thinking ...
1. Support injection of entity manager factory and entity manager
instances using Persistenc
+1 from me for the DAS piece
On 10/30/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I talked to Jeremy and I'll take over this task.
There will be two items:
1) Update pom/parent/pom.xml to be a newer version as
"2-incubator-SNAPSHOT"
to reflect two changes made in the file:
a) Add ht
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-642?page=all ]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe updated TUSCANY-642:
---
Attachment: SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation6.patch
This patch replaces stacks for linked lists in the implementation of callback
routing cha
Hi Jim,
Ok, done. I posted the patch in TUSCANY-642 (Simpl...6.patch)
On 10/31/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ignacio,
I've applied SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation5.patch from
Tuscany-648. One thing I noticed is we are using Stacks for routing.
Can we get rid of that synchr
Thanks, just applied and committed it (hopefully your commit rights
will come through soon).
Jim
On Oct 31, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hi Jim,
Ok, done. I posted the patch in TUSCANY-642 (Simpl...6.patch)
On 10/31/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ignacio,
I
Looking into how we are going to persist callback information, I
started to think about how we might simply the callback
infrastructure itself to make this and dealing with the SPI easier.
Here are some of the changes I propose we make:
1. Simplify o.a.t.spi.component.Reference SPI
- Elimi
No go for it, that would be great!
...ant
On 10/31/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So do you mind if I make the changes?
Jim
On Oct 31, 2006, at 1:02 AM, ant elder wrote:
> No, tied up on M2 things, i doubt I'll have time for this till M2
> is done.
>
> ...ant
>
> On 10/31/06,
So do you mind if I make the changes?
Jim
On Oct 31, 2006, at 1:02 AM, ant elder wrote:
No, tied up on M2 things, i doubt I'll have time for this till M2
is done.
...ant
On 10/31/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any luck in making these changes?
Jim
On Oct 26, 2006, at 8:30
I have redeployed and resigned all the artifacts listed above except for the
das artifact by rebuilding from the tags. I will do the das artifacts when
I get a distro refresh from Luciano.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 27/10/06, Jeremy Boynes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure about re-uploading
I have begun to do this.
On 27/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure about re-uploading old artifacts to the repos as Maven
adds metadata during the "deploy" step that I don't know how to
recreate.
I'm going to rebuild all the tagged artifacts for M2 and re-deploy
them t
No, tied up on M2 things, i doubt I'll have time for this till M2 is done.
...ant
On 10/31/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any luck in making these changes?
Jim
On Oct 26, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
>>
>>
>> As you don't like the easy SPI extension I've got rid of the e
Any luck in making these changes?
Jim
On Oct 26, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
As you don't like the easy SPI extension I've got rid of the easy
extension
dependency of the script container. I've moved the script
container into
trunk as it was going stale and i want to start using
Hi Ignacio,
I've applied SimplerCompositeReferenceInvocation5.patch from
Tuscany-648. One thing I noticed is we are using Stacks for routing.
Can we get rid of that synchronization overhead by using a LinkedList
since access probably doesn't need to be thread-safe or
ConcurrentLinkedList
33 matches
Mail list logo
