Hi,
FYI: I checked in the first cut of the StAX-based loaders under scdl4j/stax.
The logic is very similar to the SAX handlers.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Feng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: SCDL4J (was Re: Worki
Team,
FYI, Looks like Jeremy, Jim and Meeraj will be working on something new.
http://code.google.com/p/fabric3/
Please wish them best of luck.
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers
--
Cool - Thanks Luciano
- Ole
Luciano Resende wrote:
Sure, I saw your post on the directory list, but didn't have a chance to go
over that yet...
I'll try to send some feedback over the weekend.
On 3/30/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just sent this out on the directory develope
Hi,
I'll give a try to reorganize the current StAX based loader framework to
support the loading of SCDLs using StAX.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: SCDL4J (was Re: Worki
Pressed send too quickly, added the link to the email I was referencing :)
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 3/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't seen any replies to this, so under revision r523577 I copied
the assembly and policy model module
ant elder wrote:
On 3/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't seen any replies to this, so under revision r523577 I copied
the assembly and policy model modules that I have been working on in my
sandbox to the trunk. I put the code under tuscany/java/sca/scdl4j, as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485596
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1196:
-
I looked at it a little and noticed that the problem is that whe
Sure, I saw your post on the directory list, but didn't have a chance to go
over that yet...
I'll try to send some feedback over the weekend.
On 3/30/07, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just sent this out on the directory developers list, but thought
the Tuscany might be interested
Hi,
I just sent this out on the directory developers list, but thought
the Tuscany might be interested as well.
Some like to see the material as it evolves and some like to see the
clean version.
For those of you in the first group, this is a very "early stage" draft.
I'm starting to do test
Super. We'll stick with that convention, since LDAP ObjectClasses also
have attributes.
Thanks,
- Ole
Frank Budinsky wrote:
Well in the XML to SDO mapping, isDataType=true for properties where the
type is an xsd:simpleType, while isDataType=false if the type is an
xsd:complexType. So calli
Well in the XML to SDO mapping, isDataType=true for properties where the
type is an xsd:simpleType, while isDataType=false if the type is an
xsd:complexType. So calling them simple or complex properties (or more
specifically "properties of simple type" and "properties of complex type")
seems re
I am trying to get an extension to work with trunk but I am having
problems with getting the Connector to wire ReferenceBindings
and ServiceBindings. I tried looking for existing extensions that
are up to date, but I am not sure there are any. I looked at hessian
but it does not seem to be complet
On 3/30/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon,
The dependency:unpack and copy goals are intended to be used by binding
to a phase in the pom. They use custom objects (ArtifactItems) that
can't be defined on the CLI. If you want to run it from the CLI, you
have to first add the config
Simon,
The dependency:unpack and copy goals are intended to be used by binding
to a phase in the pom. They use custom objects (ArtifactItems) that
can't be defined on the CLI. If you want to run it from the CLI, you
have to first add the configuration to the pom as described on the link
I sent belo
Sorry for the confusion, it should be working now, after I added reference
to maven repository where the parent pom is available.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 3/30/07, Andy Grove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After running svn update earlier this week, I am unable to r
Hi Raymond,
You can use the keyword RELEASE or LATEST and that should use the
metadata for the plugin to determine the latest version. However, I
think it's dangerous not to specifically lockdown the versions your
sytem uses. We've been discussing this in the past few days on
maven-dev, and the cur
On 3/30/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Brian.
It's so nice of you to remind us. IIRC, the original problem was due to
the
newer versions of the maven-dependency-plugin as we referenced the
SNAPSHOT
version of the plugin in M2 driver. I think we have fixed the wrong
configuratio
ant elder wrote:
On 3/27/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One reason the SPI module is so large is that it does define many the
interfaces for the components in you diagram. I think there is room
for a reorganization there to clarify the usage of those interfaces.
I would propose
On 3/29/07, Brian Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm one of the Maven developers next-door at apache and the main
developer for the maven-dependency-plugin. We've had a few requests
recently from Tuscany users who have problems with the instructions or
with the pom. (I haven't found the inst
ant elder wrote:
On 3/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
decide what's going to get into the next release. Please start a wiki
pag
Hi, Brian.
It's so nice of you to remind us. IIRC, the original problem was due to the
newer versions of the maven-dependency-plugin as we referenced the SNAPSHOT
version of the plugin in M2 driver. I think we have fixed the wrong
configuration in the latest code but I'll double-check.
BTW,
On 3/28/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:37 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Adriano Crestani for Tuscany Committer
> I'd like to nominate Adr
Sounds good.
Will work on creating and dropping test cases into the iTest framework and
from there will attempt a discussion about how we can find common format for
expressing the lifecycle and relationships of applications+tests.
cheers,
Robbie
On 3/30/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1193.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 524084.
> unable to create data objects from dynam
Found a really good talk on the latest status of JRuby if anyone is
interested in keeping up to date:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=1443646504333552360&q=jruby
Near the end there's a brief mention of XML processing in JRuby, and Hpricot
[1] is mentioned. This looks really good, if any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485502
]
Caroline Maynard commented on TUSCANY-1147:
---
Sorry, there's a mistake in the test case I uploaded. The li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Caroline Maynard updated TUSCANY-1147:
--
Attachment: SDOAPITest.php
Here's an extremely stripped-down version of the test in q
On 3/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't seen any replies to this, so under revision r523577 I copied
the assembly and policy model modules that I have been working on in my
sandbox to the trunk. I put the code under tuscany/java/sca/scdl4j, as
discussed in [3],
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485468
]
Pete Robbins commented on TUSCANY-1147:
---
I'm afraid that last patch still fails in b46617b. Please post a tes
On 3/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
decide what's going to get into the next release. Please start a wiki
page to document the
I've checked in these changes. I also found some severe perfomance killers
in the defineTypes method that attempts to handle substitutionGroups. The
code was iterating the entire Type/Property tree when adding any new
property :-( ?? This iteration is only needed when adding properties to the
Root
Looks great! I'd like to add a section at the end on using using script
language components, will do that in a week or 2 once I've got the script
container up and running again in trunk. I'll probably need your help as I'm
more of a developer than information developer.
...ant
On 3/28/07, Shel
This sounds really good me, it would be excellent to have a set of SCA tests
like the SDO CTS ones. So I say just go for it, we can help sort out any
issues with automation and the testing framework as you come across them.
...ant
On 3/29/07, Robbie Minshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
F
33 matches
Mail list logo
