[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485723
]
Christian Landbo Frederiksen commented on TUSCANY-1196:
---
I am still puzzled as to why this ca
Is this a fork of Tuscany ?
If so, I would be a bit disappointed...
On 3/31/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Team,
FYI, Looks like Jeremy, Jim and Meeraj will be working on something new.
http://code.google.com/p/fabric3/
Please wish them best of luck.
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum
Let's wait and see. No clue yet. Clearly some people value their
technical prowess more than their desire to build community.
thanks,
dims
On 3/31/07, Valerio Schiavoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this a fork of Tuscany ?
If so, I would be a bit disappointed...
On 3/31/07, Davanum Srinivas
So far this is just a lot of speculation - all we have is a project
name and three people. If Asankha and I happened to set up a
code.google project I don't think it would be fair to assume we were
deserting Synapse!
Paul
On 3/31/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's wait and s
That's why i said "Let's wait and see. No clue yet." :)
-- dims
On 3/31/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So far this is just a lot of speculation - all we have is a project
name and three people. If Asankha and I happened to set up a
code.google project I don't think it would be fa
On Mar 31, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Let's wait and see. No clue yet. Clearly some people value their
technical prowess more than their desire to build community.
Dims,
The reason I will not be involved in the project is because my
interests and goals are different than othe
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 3/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
decide what's going to get into the next r
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
FYI: I checked in the first cut of the StAX-based loaders under
scdl4j/stax. The logic is very similar to the SAX handlers.
Thanks,
Raymond
Thanks Raymond, your new StAX loaders look good to me! actually better
than the SAX handlers that I had checked in yes
