Re: [DAS Java] created SDO graph doubt 2

2007-04-07 Thread Adriano Crestani
Yes, you got the point Luciano...so the reason is that it's not yet implemented on Convetion Over Configuration ; ). Thanks Adriano Crestani On 4/7/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have you setup the relationship on your DAS config file ? Should look something like the example b

Re: [DAS Java] created SDO graph doubt 2

2007-04-07 Thread Luciano Resende
Have you setup the relationship on your DAS config file ? Should look something like the example below : See more info around relationships on [1] and [2]. Now, if what you want is to have the relationship done via Convention over Configuration, I don't think we have that implemente

Re: [DAS Java] created SDO graph doubt

2007-04-07 Thread Adriano Crestani
Last doubt moved to thread: "[DAS Java] created SDO graph doubt 2" Adriano Crestani On 4/7/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another doubt: I have the following tables on my database: create table B ( ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY ); create table A ( ID INTEGER NOT N

[DAS Java] created SDO graph doubt 2

2007-04-07 Thread Adriano Crestani
Another doubt: I have the following tables on my database: create table B ( ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY ); create table A ( ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, B_ID INTEGER, FOREIGN KEY (B_ID) REFERENCES B(ID) ); OK, then I was analyzing the generated sdo graph when I execute the

Re: Cleaning up module names

2007-04-07 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Adriano Crestani wrote: +1, clearer names are good, mainly for newbies like me that isn't yet familiarized with the module names ; ) Adriano Crestani On 4/7/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Consistent is always good, and we should keep this in mind when creating new modules

Cleaning up the tree under java/sca, was: SCA source tree and build structure

2007-04-07 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Hi all, We've discussed the need for a working top-down build in a number of threads now: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg14658.html http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg15892.html http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-de

Re: Cleaning up module names

2007-04-07 Thread Venkata Krishnan
+1 for more complete names. Thanks - Venkat On 4/6/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to adopt more consistent naming conventions to name the modules under java/sca/modules. Most of our modules use complete names (binding-*, databinding-*, contribution-*), but

Re: Cleaning up module names

2007-04-07 Thread Adriano Crestani
+1, clearer names are good, mainly for newbies like me that isn't yet familiarized with the module names ; ) Adriano Crestani On 4/7/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Consistent is always good, and we should keep this in mind when creating new modules as well. On 4/6/07, Jean

Re: [DAS Java] created SDO graph doubt

2007-04-07 Thread Adriano Crestani
Another doubt: I have the following tables on my database: create table B ( ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY ); create table A ( ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, B_ID INTEGER, FOREIGN KEY (B_ID) REFERENCES B(ID) ); OK, then I was analyzing the generated sdo graph when I execute the