Re: WirePostProcessors don't get called now?

Hi, Ant. By testing samples/echo-databinding, I still see the DataBindingWirePostProcessor invoked. The call is initiated from the DeployerImpl. Here's the stacktrace: Thread [main] (Suspended (breakpoint at line 103 in DataBindingWirePostProcessor)) DataBindingWirePostProcessor.process(Wir

Re: Please review changes to bring support to nonBlockingInterceptor Fwd: svn commit: r528930 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/core: bootstrap/ deployer/

[snip] Luciano Resende wrote: Hey I tried to bring up the code to make nonBlockInerceptor working again. Could someone please review my changes. Thanks It would be good if somebody else could review it as well, but it looks OK to me, and the supplychain sample and test case now works wi

Please review changes to bring support to nonBlockingInterceptor Fwd: svn commit: r528930 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/core: bootstrap/ deployer/ runt

Hey I tried to bring up the code to make nonBlockInerceptor working again. Could someone please review my changes. Thanks -- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Apr 14, 2007 10:53 PM Subject: svn commit: r528930 - in /incubator/tuscany/java

Please review change to JavaComponentBuilder, was: Re: svn commit: r528917

Could you please review this change? I was surprised to see that the handleResources() method was not called anymore by the builder, so the PojoComponentContextFactory was not added to the component and ComponentContexts were not getting injected properly into Java component implementation ins

WirePostProcessors don't get called now?

Still trying to get the axs2 binding going, the databinding WirePostProcessor doesn't seem to be getting called anymore, thought i saw it was this morning, does anyone know if something has been changed around this area of the code? ...ant

Re: Heads-up Contribution Service refactoring

Luciano Resende wrote: One other small detail I noticed... We have ArtifactProcessors, and ContributionPackageProcessors, should these be called only PackageProcessors ? Yes, Contribution is already in the package name anyway. I'll rename this one as well. -- Jean-Sebastien

Re: Heads-up Contribution Service refactoring

One other small detail I noticed... We have ArtifactProcessors, and ContributionPackageProcessors, should these be called only PackageProcessors ? On 4/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Luciano Resende wrote: > I'm planning to make some refactoring on the contribution ser

Re: Heads-up Contribution Service refactoring

Luciano Resende wrote: I'm planning to make some refactoring on the contribution services in order to follow the same package naming convention as other modules are using, and to group related things on it's own packages and make things clear on the contribution service. Below is what I'm think

Re: Java-Impl-Runtime and DataBinding

Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi, I have got basic properties to work with the java-implementation-runtime. Here are some observations that I'd like to validate... - assuming that we load the assembly models from xml the core will always hand out to the 'implementation runtimes'' such as 'java-imple

Copied assembly-builder module to the modules directory

I copied the assembly-builder module that I had started as part of the SCDL4J work in my sandbox to the trunk under modules/assembly-java-dsl. This was the last module left that had not been integrated in the build in trunk. This is an addition which will not breaking anything in the other modu

Re: Nested composites and callbacks now working, was: Composites implementing components problem

On 4/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Simon Laws wrote: > On 4/13/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 4/13/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On 4/12/07, Simon Laws < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On

Nested composites and callbacks now working, was: Composites implementing components problem

Simon Laws wrote: On 4/13/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/13/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 4/12/07, Simon Laws < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 4/12/07, Raymond Feng < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, Simon. > > > > > > For the com

Re: How to tell if a component reference is promoted by a comosite reference?

Venkat, comments inline. Venkata Krishnan wrote: Hi, What I menetion here is only from the perspective of the 'future' plan for this. From what I understand of the assembly model, I am not so comfortable about adding 'promotedAs'. There are probably two options that I can think of which

Re: WebServiceBinding and the WSDL definition object

ant elder wrote: On 4/13/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Right now the Axis2 binding needs the WSDL4J Definition object to create an AxisService but the definition object isn't available to it anywhere. The Definition is read by the contribution service which creates a WSDLDefinition

Re: How to tell if a component reference is promoted by a comosite reference?

Hi, What I menetion here is only from the perspective of the 'future' plan for this. From what I understand of the assembly model, I am not so comfortable about adding 'promotedAs'. There are probably two options that I can think of which is 1) add the Composite Reference name to the 'tagets'

Re: WebServiceBinding and the WSDL definition object

On 4/13/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Right now the Axis2 binding needs the WSDL4J Definition object to create an AxisService but the definition object isn't available to it anywhere. The Definition is read by the contribution service which creates a WSDLDefinition, so as a bypass aro

Re: VS .ncb file

OK, I will remove it though ; ) Adriano Crestani On 4/14/07, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Adriano, No, I don't believe it is. The 3 filetypes we keep in SCA & SDO C++ are .sln, .suo and .vcproj.The .suo file is binary and sometimes contains some project info. The other 2 are xm

Re: VS .ncb file

Hi Adriano, No, I don't believe it is. The 3 filetypes we keep in SCA & SDO C++ are .sln, .suo and .vcproj.The .suo file is binary and sometimes contains some project info. The other 2 are xml and contain solution and project info respectively. Cheers Andy On 4/14/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL P

Re: [DAS] DAS POM version updates...

Done at revision #528772 On 4/13/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll start updating the DAS POMs to reflect the latest version being used on the parent pom : 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende

[DAS] Source distribution

I have added a source distribution for DAS at revision #528776. This would be very helpful for coming DAS releases as it would avoid high usage of bat files. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende

Re: VS .ncb file

It looks like DAS C++ is the only one with these files, so I'm assuming they are not needed. On 4/14/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone know if is necessary to upload the .ncb file project into the repository. Is this file really necessary to open a VS project on VS? A

VS .ncb file

Does anyone know if is necessary to upload the .ncb file project into the repository. Is this file really necessary to open a VS project on VS? Adriano Crestani