Re: Using Tuscany in a webapp, was: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it

On 4/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Luciano Resende wrote: +1 on focusing on the stability and consumability for the core functions, other then helping on simplifying the runtime further and work on a Domain concept, I also want to contribute around having a

Re: Represent the recursive composition in runtime

Hi Raymond, Thanks for bringing this up. I did get a feel of this during a recent addition that I did for supporting configuration of properties for components implemented by a composite. I was probably at loss to lay out an illustration as well as you have done :). 1) I guess the 'includes'